<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AT43 Addict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.at-43addict.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.at-43addict.com</link>
	<description>Covering Rackhams Tabletop Game AT-43</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Rackham is regulary selling off their stuff for -30 to -70%, thus basically eliminating the LGS, which can never offer this prices and stock.
Which I personally find a pitty, because the LGS is what promotes the game in our country.

I found that meanwhile I can get almost everything cheaper at Amazon or Ebay. Unfortunately for the LGS. But I&#039;ll keep buying there from time to time for the sake of loyalty.
If I find more space for more games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rackham is regulary selling off their stuff for -30 to -70%, thus basically eliminating the LGS, which can never offer this prices and stock.<br />
Which I personally find a pitty, because the LGS is what promotes the game in our country.</p>
<p>I found that meanwhile I can get almost everything cheaper at Amazon or Ebay. Unfortunately for the LGS. But I&#8217;ll keep buying there from time to time for the sake of loyalty.<br />
If I find more space for more games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by aberrios75</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>aberrios75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>Only two of us play AT-43 at my local store, some people come over to watch but then cringe when they hear that the models are pre-painted.  For folks with not a lot of free time like myself AT-43 is perfect, there is something to be said taking a game out of the box and being able to play it in less than an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only two of us play AT-43 at my local store, some people come over to watch but then cringe when they hear that the models are pre-painted.  For folks with not a lot of free time like myself AT-43 is perfect, there is something to be said taking a game out of the box and being able to play it in less than an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Went with option B.
Unfortunately COGS had all their AFVs in re-inforcement and I lost trikes to his infantry rockets before they could achieve anything :(

Fortunately I won the next battle :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went with option B.<br />
Unfortunately COGS had all their AFVs in re-inforcement and I lost trikes to his infantry rockets before they could achieve anything <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Fortunately I won the next battle <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Thanks.

Option B is certainly all-or-nothing. However, if I lose, the COGS will have to fight another Company of mine at the sector they&#039;re trying to move to, so I may be able to go risky :)
St. Anuman has the campaign medal that gices re-rolls on penetration, so impoves his effectiveness against the Vandal.

I can&#039;t 100% guarantee the Vandal will be there, but this build will make mincemeat of any type ones he fields or summons anyway.

One issue is activation order: If I win authority and bring on Jindo first into overwatch, there&#039;s the risk that the Vandal will position itself so only half Jindo&#039;s guns can fire.
I could put JU and ETs as last two, and use delayed activation if neccessary to make sure they both come on after the Vandal.

Re. ONI, I&#039;m the first to get any in my group. I don&#039;t think the 1 repair of the LD is worth it, but Option C could have a nice surpise factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Option B is certainly all-or-nothing. However, if I lose, the COGS will have to fight another Company of mine at the sector they&#8217;re trying to move to, so I may be able to go risky <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
St. Anuman has the campaign medal that gices re-rolls on penetration, so impoves his effectiveness against the Vandal.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t 100% guarantee the Vandal will be there, but this build will make mincemeat of any type ones he fields or summons anyway.</p>
<p>One issue is activation order: If I win authority and bring on Jindo first into overwatch, there&#8217;s the risk that the Vandal will position itself so only half Jindo&#8217;s guns can fire.<br />
I could put JU and ETs as last two, and use delayed activation if neccessary to make sure they both come on after the Vandal.</p>
<p>Re. ONI, I&#8217;m the first to get any in my group. I don&#8217;t think the 1 repair of the LD is worth it, but Option C could have a nice surpise factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-979</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going the Jindo-Un Route I would watch out for deflector shields from the T-Regulators. This will make taking those AFV&#039;s out quite difficult until you can kill the hero. 

You&#039;ve got snipers to hep deal with that situation should it arise. I find the medtec + K-shooter combo to be devastating good choice there.

You don&#039;t want to get into a shootout with the cogs and taking out the vandal is going to be the highest priority. I would risk using the 3 easy trike combo last activation, first activation and hope to take out the vandal, you have K-shooters to back them up. Then just BBQ around the board if they survive or focus on the smaller afvs. 

I find with Jindo it is either all or nothing, it can pay off big or fail miserably. I haven&#039;t had much chance to play with ONI as a mercenary force so I&#039;m not sure how that would play out. 

I would tend to lean towards option B if I knew a vandal was coming, that would put a serious dent in the cogs ability to deal damage from the first few turns and make it safe for your (few)  infantry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going the Jindo-Un Route I would watch out for deflector shields from the T-Regulators. This will make taking those AFV&#8217;s out quite difficult until you can kill the hero. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got snipers to hep deal with that situation should it arise. I find the medtec + K-shooter combo to be devastating good choice there.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t want to get into a shootout with the cogs and taking out the vandal is going to be the highest priority. I would risk using the 3 easy trike combo last activation, first activation and hope to take out the vandal, you have K-shooters to back them up. Then just BBQ around the board if they survive or focus on the smaller afvs. </p>
<p>I find with Jindo it is either all or nothing, it can pay off big or fail miserably. I haven&#8217;t had much chance to play with ONI as a mercenary force so I&#8217;m not sure how that would play out. </p>
<p>I would tend to lean towards option B if I knew a vandal was coming, that would put a serious dent in the cogs ability to deal damage from the first few turns and make it safe for your (few)  infantry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-978</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve playing in a Frostbite campaign and have a Concord Square battle due against the COGS. Phase 1 so 2000 split 1500/500. My faction is Flux vs. Generic Cogs.

As it&#039;s a relaticely open map I expect COGS to field a Vandal, plus thier normal Type 1 AFV-summoning.

I plan to use St Anuman&#039;s hijacking ability to turn the COG AFVs against them, with possible ONI backup (I have ONI Box plus Samedi another Lt Enforcer).

Possible lists:

Option A.

Platoon 1 
 - 2 K-Shooters* 
 - 3 Medtec 
 - Jindo-Un (+ Saint Anuman) 
 - 2 Easy Trike (Mentor) 
 - 2 Kaptars Sniper Team* 
Platoon 2 (ONI) 
 - 3 Medtec* 
 - 1 Light Destroyer (Samurai) 
Off platoon 
 - 3 Civilians
[*Re-enforcements]

The 4 AFVs plan to sieze the centre, the ONI LD provideing repair to keep the others in play. Disadvantage - no grounding and little dedicated anti-infantry.

Option B:
Platoon 1 
 - 2 K-Shooters* (Mentor) 
 - 3 Medtec 
 - Jindo-Un* (+ Saint Anuman) 
 - 3 Easy Trike (Mentor) 
 - 2 Kaptars Sniper Team* 
Off platoon 
 - 3 Civilians 

Similar tactics, fielding a 3rd ET for survivability instead of relying on repair. Similar disadvantages.

Option C.
Platoon 1 
 - 2 K-Shooters* 
 - 3 Medtec 
 - Jindo-Un (+ Saint Anuman) 
 - 2 Easy Trike 
 - 2 Kaptars Sniper Team* 
Platoon 2 
 - 6 Super Zombie R. Alpha (+ Samurai B. Samedi, 1 Zombie Gun) 
Off platoon 
 - 3 Civilians

A more balanced list. The 3 Zombie Guns provide grounding and possiblity to convert infantry as well as AFVs.

Any thoughts?
(posted here as my oponent reads the RE forums)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve playing in a Frostbite campaign and have a Concord Square battle due against the COGS. Phase 1 so 2000 split 1500/500. My faction is Flux vs. Generic Cogs.</p>
<p>As it&#8217;s a relaticely open map I expect COGS to field a Vandal, plus thier normal Type 1 AFV-summoning.</p>
<p>I plan to use St Anuman&#8217;s hijacking ability to turn the COG AFVs against them, with possible ONI backup (I have ONI Box plus Samedi another Lt Enforcer).</p>
<p>Possible lists:</p>
<p>Option A.</p>
<p>Platoon 1<br />
 &#8211; 2 K-Shooters*<br />
 &#8211; 3 Medtec<br />
 &#8211; Jindo-Un (+ Saint Anuman)<br />
 &#8211; 2 Easy Trike (Mentor)<br />
 &#8211; 2 Kaptars Sniper Team*<br />
Platoon 2 (ONI)<br />
 &#8211; 3 Medtec*<br />
 &#8211; 1 Light Destroyer (Samurai)<br />
Off platoon<br />
 &#8211; 3 Civilians<br />
[*Re-enforcements]</p>
<p>The 4 AFVs plan to sieze the centre, the ONI LD provideing repair to keep the others in play. Disadvantage &#8211; no grounding and little dedicated anti-infantry.</p>
<p>Option B:<br />
Platoon 1<br />
 &#8211; 2 K-Shooters* (Mentor)<br />
 &#8211; 3 Medtec<br />
 &#8211; Jindo-Un* (+ Saint Anuman)<br />
 &#8211; 3 Easy Trike (Mentor)<br />
 &#8211; 2 Kaptars Sniper Team*<br />
Off platoon<br />
 &#8211; 3 Civilians </p>
<p>Similar tactics, fielding a 3rd ET for survivability instead of relying on repair. Similar disadvantages.</p>
<p>Option C.<br />
Platoon 1<br />
 &#8211; 2 K-Shooters*<br />
 &#8211; 3 Medtec<br />
 &#8211; Jindo-Un (+ Saint Anuman)<br />
 &#8211; 2 Easy Trike<br />
 &#8211; 2 Kaptars Sniper Team*<br />
Platoon 2<br />
 &#8211; 6 Super Zombie R. Alpha (+ Samurai B. Samedi, 1 Zombie Gun)<br />
Off platoon<br />
 &#8211; 3 Civilians</p>
<p>A more balanced list. The 3 Zombie Guns provide grounding and possiblity to convert infantry as well as AFVs.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?<br />
(posted here as my oponent reads the RE forums)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni Army Box Opening by Cog zombies</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-army-box-opening/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Cog zombies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1080#comment-977</guid>
		<description>I just got my oni army box and army book recently, the box is amazing! i plan on using it mainly for little additions to my cog army since any army can recruit oni units!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my oni army box and army book recently, the box is amazing! i plan on using it mainly for little additions to my cog army since any army can recruit oni units!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-976</guid>
		<description>A message for tabletop wargamers and where AT-43 fits in...

There is no simple explanation as to why some have success while others do not.  Tabletop gaming is and will always remain outside the mainstream, particularly with the advent of PC / video gaming...as well as the portability and lesser space needed for board and card games.  That being stated, there is, however, a commited group of individuals interested in table top miniatures style games.  

So what of AT-43 and Rackham as a whole...?

AT-43 has an interesting theme, prepainted miniatures, and is relatively easy to learn and play, but has tactical depth...sounds good so far.  However, speaking from my own experience, I live in Phoenix, AZ where there are only 2 active tabletop game related stores, which both stock and sell Rackham products, but the tables and calendars are booked with GW and a few others...NO Rackham or AT-43.

Some 20 years ago, a friend and I discovered a store in North Los Angeles which was very small but very well run for its time.  The owners actively played games alternately with the customers using their own miniatures, not requiring any purchases, etc...and after a couple of plays I became hooked.

My advise to Rackham is this....you need to develop grass root support for your products through &quot;liaison gamers&#039; who will target and recruit your audience.

I see many people go in and out of gaming specialty stores empty handed and game tables sitting unused.  Why?  Every customer is an opportunity, particularly the 10-15 age group.  As a liaison, I would set aside a table for AT-43 for a demo during peak times, set up display materials to be viewed, and have the game packs, starters, etc. ready at hand with prudently marked down items.

Last world on the subject: If you are a gamer, it&#039;s not an either/or proposition.  Most gamers play multiple titles.  There is no reason why GW and Rackham cannot coexist.  Players will have preferences and there is SO much about AT-43 to like and different from the competition, that it should succeed.  Evaluate the areas within the US and Europe where it is selling well and being actively played, and I will show you players and owners recruiting.  Stores and games have much in common - their live span depends upon &#039;new&#039; blood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A message for tabletop wargamers and where AT-43 fits in&#8230;</p>
<p>There is no simple explanation as to why some have success while others do not.  Tabletop gaming is and will always remain outside the mainstream, particularly with the advent of PC / video gaming&#8230;as well as the portability and lesser space needed for board and card games.  That being stated, there is, however, a commited group of individuals interested in table top miniatures style games.  </p>
<p>So what of AT-43 and Rackham as a whole&#8230;?</p>
<p>AT-43 has an interesting theme, prepainted miniatures, and is relatively easy to learn and play, but has tactical depth&#8230;sounds good so far.  However, speaking from my own experience, I live in Phoenix, AZ where there are only 2 active tabletop game related stores, which both stock and sell Rackham products, but the tables and calendars are booked with GW and a few others&#8230;NO Rackham or AT-43.</p>
<p>Some 20 years ago, a friend and I discovered a store in North Los Angeles which was very small but very well run for its time.  The owners actively played games alternately with the customers using their own miniatures, not requiring any purchases, etc&#8230;and after a couple of plays I became hooked.</p>
<p>My advise to Rackham is this&#8230;.you need to develop grass root support for your products through &#8220;liaison gamers&#8217; who will target and recruit your audience.</p>
<p>I see many people go in and out of gaming specialty stores empty handed and game tables sitting unused.  Why?  Every customer is an opportunity, particularly the 10-15 age group.  As a liaison, I would set aside a table for AT-43 for a demo during peak times, set up display materials to be viewed, and have the game packs, starters, etc. ready at hand with prudently marked down items.</p>
<p>Last world on the subject: If you are a gamer, it&#8217;s not an either/or proposition.  Most gamers play multiple titles.  There is no reason why GW and Rackham cannot coexist.  Players will have preferences and there is SO much about AT-43 to like and different from the competition, that it should succeed.  Evaluate the areas within the US and Europe where it is selling well and being actively played, and I will show you players and owners recruiting.  Stores and games have much in common &#8211; their live span depends upon &#8216;new&#8217; blood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Defensive GenCol List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/una/2000-point-defensive-gencol-list/comment-page-1/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=896#comment-974</guid>
		<description>Yes, 3 snipers. Hide them somewhere near the back of the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 3 snipers. Hide them somewhere near the back of the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Defensive GenCol List by learning</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/una/2000-point-defensive-gencol-list/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=896#comment-973</guid>
		<description>dragonov groupa s = 3 dragonov kommando snipers, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dragonov groupa s = 3 dragonov kommando snipers, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Activation Order: Part 2 by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/activation-order-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=132#comment-972</guid>
		<description>This is a rule that has been clarified in the rules forum. This was a problem in translation for the stealth rules. Instead of &quot;automatic failure&quot; they really meant &quot;automatic miss&quot;. If you use the definition of automatic failure from the rulebook then you are correct but unfortunately as with many rules in the rulebooks they have been translated poorly or the definitions have changed over time. Here is a link to the rules forum ruling regarding this. http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=5719 

Hope that clears things up a little. Thanks for pointing that out though, when we read that rules forum post it made us scratch our heads and say &quot;what?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rule that has been clarified in the rules forum. This was a problem in translation for the stealth rules. Instead of &#8220;automatic failure&#8221; they really meant &#8220;automatic miss&#8221;. If you use the definition of automatic failure from the rulebook then you are correct but unfortunately as with many rules in the rulebooks they have been translated poorly or the definitions have changed over time. Here is a link to the rules forum ruling regarding this. <a href="http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=5719" rel="nofollow">http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=5719</a> </p>
<p>Hope that clears things up a little. Thanks for pointing that out though, when we read that rules forum post it made us scratch our heads and say &#8220;what?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Activation Order: Part 2 by Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/activation-order-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=132#comment-971</guid>
		<description>sorry my post was meant for the strategies against stealth units</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry my post was meant for the strategies against stealth units</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Activation Order: Part 2 by Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/activation-order-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=132#comment-970</guid>
		<description>actually you cannot fire at and hit stealth units at a range band greater than 1. the stealth rule specifically states that shots fired at it from a range band greater than one are &quot;automatic failures&quot;, and the indirect fire rules state that if the shooting test would result in an &quot;automatic failure&quot; then the shot is &quot;lost in the blue and therefore doesn&#039;t hit anything.&quot; (official rules pg. 65).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually you cannot fire at and hit stealth units at a range band greater than 1. the stealth rule specifically states that shots fired at it from a range band greater than one are &#8220;automatic failures&#8221;, and the indirect fire rules state that if the shooting test would result in an &#8220;automatic failure&#8221; then the shot is &#8220;lost in the blue and therefore doesn&#8217;t hit anything.&#8221; (official rules pg. 65).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hekat Summoning &#8211; The Creation Routine by Teneb</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/hekat-summoning-the-creation-routine/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Teneb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=219#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Note that with a recent ruling on the AT-43 forums, hekats can now be spawned as alpha overseers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that with a recent ruling on the AT-43 forums, hekats can now be spawned as alpha overseers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Supaplex</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Supaplex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-968</guid>
		<description>In fact R have prodused almost all units form armybooks. 
But you can&#039;t buy it anywhere.
And that&#039;s the main problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact R have prodused almost all units form armybooks.<br />
But you can&#8217;t buy it anywhere.<br />
And that&#8217;s the main problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs T-Regulator Heroes by Der Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/t-regulator-heroes/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1032#comment-967</guid>
		<description>I have proxied this in 2 battles, this ones are killers.... the deflector shield makes the Vandal (and 2 support Prowlers) monsters of endurance in particualr if you add the autorepair... 

Not to mention the T-regulator advantage (running and shooting) the disadvantage in small games is not noticeable as you have few units thus the random deployment hurts not that much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have proxied this in 2 battles, this ones are killers&#8230;. the deflector shield makes the Vandal (and 2 support Prowlers) monsters of endurance in particualr if you add the autorepair&#8230; </p>
<p>Not to mention the T-regulator advantage (running and shooting) the disadvantage in small games is not noticeable as you have few units thus the random deployment hurts not that much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs C-Naps Heroes by Der Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/c-naps-heroes/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1042#comment-966</guid>
		<description>While the box gives you a good start I dont really think it gaves you a good force, especially if you compare it, for example, to the red blok box,  here in Asutria there will be a small tournament with 2000 AP locked lists (i,e. those from the box or made for this tournament, the lists are:

UNA (*):
- Fire Crawler (-)
- Copperhead (Colonel G. Stark)
- 3 Steel TacArms (Sergeant, Laser Targeter)
- 8 Star Troopers (Sergeant, 1 Volcano MG, 2 Medic)
- 7 Steel Troopers (Master-Sergeant, 1 Missile Launcher, 2 Mechanic)

THERIANER:
- 6 Grims Golems (Omega, 1 Flamer)
- Baal Golgoth (Relay)
- 3 Bane Goliaths (Relay)
- Incubus Golgoth (Alpha)
- 6 Storm Golems (Alpha, 1 Sonic Gun)

RED BLOCK:
- 12 Krasnye Soldaty (Captain, 3 Grenade Launcher, 2 Medic)
- 8 Krasnye Soldaty (Sergeant, 1 Grenade Launcher, 2 Mechanic)
- 6 Dragonov Kommandos (Sergeant, 1 Sniper Gun, 1 Medic, 1 Electronic warfare)
- Urod (Colonels Odin &amp; Manon)
- Dotch Yaga (-)

KARMANS:
- 4 Kaptars (Mentor Freezer, Mechanic, Karmic Warrior)
- 5 Wendigos (Venerable Cornelius, Medic, Karmic Warrior)
- 2 Jungle Trike (Mentor)
- Storm Mammoth (Guru, Karmic Warrior)

COGS:
- 4 Warmongers (C-naps G09, G45)
- 4 Sharpshooters (C-naps G36)
- 1 Prowler (-)
- Vandal (-)

ONI:
- 8 Zombies Detonator (-)
-12 Super Zombies Reanimator (Shomyo, 2 Zombie Gun Bearers, 1 Zombie Master, 1 Medic)
- 3 Zombie TacArms Alpha (Samurai)
- Vlad (Shogun N. Bokov)
- 1 Medium Destroyer (-)

The Cogs have a difficult time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the box gives you a good start I dont really think it gaves you a good force, especially if you compare it, for example, to the red blok box,  here in Asutria there will be a small tournament with 2000 AP locked lists (i,e. those from the box or made for this tournament, the lists are:</p>
<p>UNA (*):<br />
- Fire Crawler (-)<br />
- Copperhead (Colonel G. Stark)<br />
- 3 Steel TacArms (Sergeant, Laser Targeter)<br />
- 8 Star Troopers (Sergeant, 1 Volcano MG, 2 Medic)<br />
- 7 Steel Troopers (Master-Sergeant, 1 Missile Launcher, 2 Mechanic)</p>
<p>THERIANER:<br />
- 6 Grims Golems (Omega, 1 Flamer)<br />
- Baal Golgoth (Relay)<br />
- 3 Bane Goliaths (Relay)<br />
- Incubus Golgoth (Alpha)<br />
- 6 Storm Golems (Alpha, 1 Sonic Gun)</p>
<p>RED BLOCK:<br />
- 12 Krasnye Soldaty (Captain, 3 Grenade Launcher, 2 Medic)<br />
- 8 Krasnye Soldaty (Sergeant, 1 Grenade Launcher, 2 Mechanic)<br />
- 6 Dragonov Kommandos (Sergeant, 1 Sniper Gun, 1 Medic, 1 Electronic warfare)<br />
- Urod (Colonels Odin &amp; Manon)<br />
- Dotch Yaga (-)</p>
<p>KARMANS:<br />
- 4 Kaptars (Mentor Freezer, Mechanic, Karmic Warrior)<br />
- 5 Wendigos (Venerable Cornelius, Medic, Karmic Warrior)<br />
- 2 Jungle Trike (Mentor)<br />
- Storm Mammoth (Guru, Karmic Warrior)</p>
<p>COGS:<br />
- 4 Warmongers (C-naps G09, G45)<br />
- 4 Sharpshooters (C-naps G36)<br />
- 1 Prowler (-)<br />
- Vandal (-)</p>
<p>ONI:<br />
- 8 Zombies Detonator (-)<br />
-12 Super Zombies Reanimator (Shomyo, 2 Zombie Gun Bearers, 1 Zombie Master, 1 Medic)<br />
- 3 Zombie TacArms Alpha (Samurai)<br />
- Vlad (Shogun N. Bokov)<br />
- 1 Medium Destroyer (-)</p>
<p>The Cogs have a difficult time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Jedi</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-963</guid>
		<description>Yes, everything cheap, compared to EU, specially middle Europe. In Germany, Austria is near everything cheaper (and 5x bigger salary). But its same fairy tale again, again :-)

So EU prices are high. Maybe in US nobody will buy stuff which will have same prices as in EU :-)))

I know few players, we starting some advertisement on some game week, gamecons and more. Problem is that no game shop has this stuff and nobody want it put in stock.

If I compare shipping cost from US to Czech. Its same price per model as in EU.
for example unit cost 10$ in US, with shipping to CZ it costs 10 Eur.
Its still good, but new models is near same, mostly better to buy directly from R.

We need some advertisement and at least on shop with stuff :-)
One month ago I have done some exhibition of AT-43 on one game week. Many games were there, and a lot of people said that AT-43 is very very good looking and great game.
and asked me, where  can they buy it.
I said... ehm, EU and US. :-)
So I wont be new distributor, I have another biz.

TOG game is in all shops :-) Many gamers have same level of frustration with painting , scenery, IGOWHOLEARMYOUDIEINFIRSTROUD etc. I will want other game, if they know more about that..

And we lost few players with  old rules problem (routines, errata for many units etc.)

look at the offer our shops
http://www.cernyrytir.cz
http://shop.fantasy.cz/
http://www.pekelnykotlik.cz/
http://tomovyhry.cz
http://www.hras.cz
http://www.planetaher.cz
http://www.rebelshop.cz


TOG, TOG, TOG and a lot of other minis games.

 I think ONI will make better reputation :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, everything cheap, compared to EU, specially middle Europe. In Germany, Austria is near everything cheaper (and 5x bigger salary). But its same fairy tale again, again <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So EU prices are high. Maybe in US nobody will buy stuff which will have same prices as in EU <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))</p>
<p>I know few players, we starting some advertisement on some game week, gamecons and more. Problem is that no game shop has this stuff and nobody want it put in stock.</p>
<p>If I compare shipping cost from US to Czech. Its same price per model as in EU.<br />
for example unit cost 10$ in US, with shipping to CZ it costs 10 Eur.<br />
Its still good, but new models is near same, mostly better to buy directly from R.</p>
<p>We need some advertisement and at least on shop with stuff <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
One month ago I have done some exhibition of AT-43 on one game week. Many games were there, and a lot of people said that AT-43 is very very good looking and great game.<br />
and asked me, where  can they buy it.<br />
I said&#8230; ehm, EU and US. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
So I wont be new distributor, I have another biz.</p>
<p>TOG game is in all shops <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Many gamers have same level of frustration with painting , scenery, IGOWHOLEARMYOUDIEINFIRSTROUD etc. I will want other game, if they know more about that..</p>
<p>And we lost few players with  old rules problem (routines, errata for many units etc.)</p>
<p>look at the offer our shops<br />
<a href="http://www.cernyrytir.cz" rel="nofollow">http://www.cernyrytir.cz</a><br />
<a href="http://shop.fantasy.cz/" rel="nofollow">http://shop.fantasy.cz/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pekelnykotlik.cz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pekelnykotlik.cz/</a><br />
<a href="http://tomovyhry.cz" rel="nofollow">http://tomovyhry.cz</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hras.cz" rel="nofollow">http://www.hras.cz</a><br />
<a href="http://www.planetaher.cz" rel="nofollow">http://www.planetaher.cz</a><br />
<a href="http://www.rebelshop.cz" rel="nofollow">http://www.rebelshop.cz</a></p>
<p>TOG, TOG, TOG and a lot of other minis games.</p>
<p> I think ONI will make better reputation <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to hear that you have trouble getting your shop to stock the game. I am fortunate that I am in Canada and can take advantage of fairly cheap shipping from the US. From what I&#039;ve seen the EU prices are astronomical compared to the US ones.

Would a dedicated player locator help you find more players or do you think that because of the high shipping costs to the Czech Republic that the chances of there being any more AT-43 players is small?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear that you have trouble getting your shop to stock the game. I am fortunate that I am in Canada and can take advantage of fairly cheap shipping from the US. From what I&#8217;ve seen the EU prices are astronomical compared to the US ones.</p>
<p>Would a dedicated player locator help you find more players or do you think that because of the high shipping costs to the Czech Republic that the chances of there being any more AT-43 players is small?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Jedi</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Vastatum, I tell you why we havent player. Because we havent this game in ours game shop.

MTG, TOG a lot of other shit there. But AT-43 not.

Our local gaming shop stopped selling AT-43 because of Rackham delay and high shipping cost from Rackham (stupidity from R). But its a year ago. 

Now we re trying to help ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vastatum, I tell you why we havent player. Because we havent this game in ours game shop.</p>
<p>MTG, TOG a lot of other shit there. But AT-43 not.</p>
<p>Our local gaming shop stopped selling AT-43 because of Rackham delay and high shipping cost from Rackham (stupidity from R). But its a year ago. </p>
<p>Now we re trying to help ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Agreed, I share his frustration that AT-43 hasn&#039;t blown up massively yet. We all know the game is the best thing since sliced bread and can&#039;t understand why there aren&#039;t a bajillion players buying and playing it. 

Its got Gorillas in Power armour! What more do you need!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, I share his frustration that AT-43 hasn&#8217;t blown up massively yet. We all know the game is the best thing since sliced bread and can&#8217;t understand why there aren&#8217;t a bajillion players buying and playing it. </p>
<p>Its got Gorillas in Power armour! What more do you need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Wolf&#8217;s Open Letter by Mickey Gntile</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/michael-wolfs-open-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Gntile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=1083#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Sounds like someone looking for a job! Not a bad idea but could have been a little more subtle. Hopefully he will get hired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like someone looking for a job! Not a bad idea but could have been a little more subtle. Hopefully he will get hired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Battle Display by Fragiller</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-battle-display/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Fragiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=990#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Thanks... 

Surprisingly very short time... I quess about one hour for one board... Its very easy. I&#039;ll write more detailed work plan... I apologize for my english, I from czech rep. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; </p>
<p>Surprisingly very short time&#8230; I quess about one hour for one board&#8230; Its very easy. I&#8217;ll write more detailed work plan&#8230; I apologize for my english, I from czech rep. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Battle Display by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-battle-display/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=990#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Thats a great board Fragiller. How many hours does it take to get a board to that level of quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a great board Fragiller. How many hours does it take to get a board to that level of quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Battle Display by Fragiller</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-battle-display/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Fragiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=990#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Some photo of my table... I&#039;ts only one board now... I&#039;ll complete two more soon...

http://img205.imageshack.us/i/24640502.jpg/
http://img210.imageshack.us/i/87184060.jpg/
http://img26.imageshack.us/i/75802009.jpg/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some photo of my table&#8230; I&#8217;ts only one board now&#8230; I&#8217;ll complete two more soon&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://img205.imageshack.us/i/24640502.jpg/" rel="nofollow">http://img205.imageshack.us/i/24640502.jpg/</a><br />
<a href="http://img210.imageshack.us/i/87184060.jpg/" rel="nofollow">http://img210.imageshack.us/i/87184060.jpg/</a><br />
<a href="http://img26.imageshack.us/i/75802009.jpg/" rel="nofollow">http://img26.imageshack.us/i/75802009.jpg/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Battle Display by Lapushka</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-battle-display/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Lapushka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=990#comment-951</guid>
		<description>A very cool looking table!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very cool looking table!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Defensive GenCol List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/una/2000-point-defensive-gencol-list/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=896#comment-950</guid>
		<description>This is over ruled by the gencol advantage that says &quot;the company may ignore the limitation on officers concerning heroes&quot;

so feel free to use those dual urod to your hearts desire!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is over ruled by the gencol advantage that says &#8220;the company may ignore the limitation on officers concerning heroes&#8221;</p>
<p>so feel free to use those dual urod to your hearts desire!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Defensive GenCol List by Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/una/2000-point-defensive-gencol-list/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=896#comment-949</guid>
		<description>Is dual Urod permitted? I know that GenCol allows multiple heros via cloning, but pg 79 of the rulebook states that only one rank 5 officer is allowed per company. 
Does GenCol get around this as well?

~Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is dual Urod permitted? I know that GenCol allows multiple heros via cloning, but pg 79 of the rulebook states that only one rank 5 officer is allowed per company.<br />
Does GenCol get around this as well?</p>
<p>~Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Starter Lists by Supaplex</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-starter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Supaplex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=209#comment-948</guid>
		<description>No problem, happy to help ;)

Plz, add here COG starter list =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, happy to help <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Plz, add here COG starter list =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Starter Lists by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-starter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=209#comment-947</guid>
		<description>Thanks for catching that! I&#039;ve corrected the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching that! I&#8217;ve corrected the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Starter Lists by Supaplex</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-starter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Supaplex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=209#comment-946</guid>
		<description>Link to Karman trikes is incorrect. Should be http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/karman-trikes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link to Karman trikes is incorrect. Should be <a href="http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/karman-trikes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/karman-trikes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide Darius by Arpad</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/guide-darius/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=596#comment-943</guid>
		<description>This has been Errata&#039;d now - thankfully - and he can join any rank 1 infantry unit.
Errata found here: http://www.rackham.fr/newsletter/cry_online/img82/Errata_AT43_US.pdf

There are also rumours that Mentor Freezer will be fixed soon by Rackham, possibly to co-incide with the Karmans Army Box release after Christmas. We already know that the Army Box will have some new rules released in the form of a new version of the King Mammoth equipped with twin Rocket Launchers, and there may also be some changes to the Jungle Trikes such as upgraded armour or structure points... we hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been Errata&#8217;d now &#8211; thankfully &#8211; and he can join any rank 1 infantry unit.<br />
Errata found here: <a href="http://www.rackham.fr/newsletter/cry_online/img82/Errata_AT43_US.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.rackham.fr/newsletter/cry_online/img82/Errata_AT43_US.pdf</a></p>
<p>There are also rumours that Mentor Freezer will be fixed soon by Rackham, possibly to co-incide with the Karmans Army Box release after Christmas. We already know that the Army Box will have some new rules released in the form of a new version of the King Mammoth equipped with twin Rocket Launchers, and there may also be some changes to the Jungle Trikes such as upgraded armour or structure points&#8230; we hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking for a Cogs Review by Bright Ecthelion</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/looking-for-a-cogs-review/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Ecthelion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=946#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Whoops, sorry forgot the link http://www.atlantis-comics.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=6415</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, sorry forgot the link <a href="http://www.atlantis-comics.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=6415" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlantis-comics.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=6415</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking for a Cogs Review by Bright Ecthelion</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/looking-for-a-cogs-review/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Ecthelion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=946#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Here is a review I did for my FLGS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a review I did for my FLGS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by ms pacman</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>ms pacman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-932</guid>
		<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Cry Havoc Online, Sort of&#8230; by Bright Ecthelion</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-cry-havoc-online-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Ecthelion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=983#comment-931</guid>
		<description>I came into playing this game around the time that the CHOs were sort of being &quot;phased&quot; out.  I have read the old issues, thanks in large part to Nazgul.  I can see a need for these but as recently posted on the forums, RE will be moving to a more global method of getting this type of information out when the new site is up.  There already have been improvements to the RE sites....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came into playing this game around the time that the CHOs were sort of being &#8220;phased&#8221; out.  I have read the old issues, thanks in large part to Nazgul.  I can see a need for these but as recently posted on the forums, RE will be moving to a more global method of getting this type of information out when the new site is up.  There already have been improvements to the RE sites&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Cry Havoc Online, Sort of&#8230; by Cyborg Trucker</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-cry-havoc-online-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyborg Trucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=983#comment-930</guid>
		<description>I agree the company is run about as well as GW is. This is rather disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the company is run about as well as GW is. This is rather disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Congrats also!!! May you always roll sixes in your marriage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats also!!! May you always roll sixes in your marriage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scenarios by AT-43 &#8211; Army Boxes. Models, check. Rules, check. Terrain, check. Aids, check. Mission. Mission. MISSION? &#124; Incunabulog</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/scenarios/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>AT-43 &#8211; Army Boxes. Models, check. Rules, check. Terrain, check. Aids, check. Mission. Mission. MISSION? &#124; Incunabulog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?page_id=242#comment-928</guid>
		<description>[...] can download some missions, but all of them need items that you won&#8217;t find in either army boxe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can download some missions, but all of them need items that you won&#8217;t find in either army boxe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide Darius by Erifnogard</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/guide-darius/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Erifnogard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=596#comment-927</guid>
		<description>We had assumed that Darius went with the Kaptars because he is equipped like them.  It makes absolutely no sense to put him with the Anakongas.  This was obviously a mistake that Rackham refused to admit.  We will be playing him as a Kaptar hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had assumed that Darius went with the Kaptars because he is equipped like them.  It makes absolutely no sense to put him with the Anakongas.  This was obviously a mistake that Rackham refused to admit.  We will be playing him as a Kaptar hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future Waves Delayed by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/future-waves-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=974#comment-925</guid>
		<description>There are no indications that Rackham will go belly up. They have always been having production problems since the beginning of time its sort of become a bit of a joke in the community that they&#039;ll never release anything on time. 

The original pre frostbite UNA troops are very hard to find right now, even firetoads are hard to come by. I don&#039;t know when Rackham is planning on doing another batch of steel/star troopers or what camo scheme they would have.

Multiple camo schemes are a point of contention in the community lots of people love them lots of people hate them for creating a mismatched look on the battlefield. This is definitely not an indication of the health of rackham, just the crappiness of their overseas production, they just seem unable to do things correctly on time.

I feel your pain about UNA though, I have a friend that recently got into the game and is also having a ton of trouble getting UNA steel troopers and Fire toads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no indications that Rackham will go belly up. They have always been having production problems since the beginning of time its sort of become a bit of a joke in the community that they&#8217;ll never release anything on time. </p>
<p>The original pre frostbite UNA troops are very hard to find right now, even firetoads are hard to come by. I don&#8217;t know when Rackham is planning on doing another batch of steel/star troopers or what camo scheme they would have.</p>
<p>Multiple camo schemes are a point of contention in the community lots of people love them lots of people hate them for creating a mismatched look on the battlefield. This is definitely not an indication of the health of rackham, just the crappiness of their overseas production, they just seem unable to do things correctly on time.</p>
<p>I feel your pain about UNA though, I have a friend that recently got into the game and is also having a ton of trouble getting UNA steel troopers and Fire toads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Future Waves Delayed by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/future-waves-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=974#comment-923</guid>
		<description>I am having a really hard time finding the pre-frost bite style UNA troops.  I really do not like the frost bite Star troopers.  Has there been any rumors that AT-43 may go belly up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having a really hard time finding the pre-frost bite style UNA troops.  I really do not like the frost bite Star troopers.  Has there been any rumors that AT-43 may go belly up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni in the wild by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-in-the-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=970#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Me too, I love the look of them, I passed on the cogs but am salivating at the idea of picking up Oni.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too, I love the look of them, I passed on the cogs but am salivating at the idea of picking up Oni.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni in the wild by Lapushka</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-in-the-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Lapushka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=970#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really looking forward tot he ONI, lets hope Rackham actually launch them on time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward tot he ONI, lets hope Rackham actually launch them on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Countering Stealth by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/countering-stealth/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=147#comment-920</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it goes against the spirit of the rules myself. The way I view stealth is that it does not completely hide a unit from being detected, what it does do is prevent it from being shot at with any degree of success. I know the enemy is moving somewhere over in that general direction so lets pour a ton of template weapons over there and hope to hit them.

One of my favourite sayings is &quot;close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades&quot; and that definitely applies to the stealthed units.

In AT-43 stealthed units are detectable you can see them on the battlefield you know where they are moving to and can move your troops to counter their own movement, you just can&#039;t shoot them with precision weapons very effectively because you don&#039;t know exactly where they are. Template weapons just need to be &quot;close&quot; and they will always miss and scatter to represent the fact the gunners are simply guessing at the exact location of the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it goes against the spirit of the rules myself. The way I view stealth is that it does not completely hide a unit from being detected, what it does do is prevent it from being shot at with any degree of success. I know the enemy is moving somewhere over in that general direction so lets pour a ton of template weapons over there and hope to hit them.</p>
<p>One of my favourite sayings is &#8220;close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades&#8221; and that definitely applies to the stealthed units.</p>
<p>In AT-43 stealthed units are detectable you can see them on the battlefield you know where they are moving to and can move your troops to counter their own movement, you just can&#8217;t shoot them with precision weapons very effectively because you don&#8217;t know exactly where they are. Template weapons just need to be &#8220;close&#8221; and they will always miss and scatter to represent the fact the gunners are simply guessing at the exact location of the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Countering Stealth by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/countering-stealth/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=147#comment-919</guid>
		<description>You know, I really thought you weren&#039;t allowed to shoot--as in even TRY to shoot a stealthed unit. Is this an interpretation of the rules or is it literally stated this way? Sorry, but I&#039;m travelling and don&#039;t have my book with me. Do you feel this goes against the spirit of the rules (like players who try to target indirect fire on a wall so they can hit the soldiers hidden behind it in the blast... glad the FAQ stopped that nonsense) or is it something all players will be comfortable with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I really thought you weren&#8217;t allowed to shoot&#8211;as in even TRY to shoot a stealthed unit. Is this an interpretation of the rules or is it literally stated this way? Sorry, but I&#8217;m travelling and don&#8217;t have my book with me. Do you feel this goes against the spirit of the rules (like players who try to target indirect fire on a wall so they can hit the soldiers hidden behind it in the blast&#8230; glad the FAQ stopped that nonsense) or is it something all players will be comfortable with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by Adam Isherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Isherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Congratulations dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-917</guid>
		<description>Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by Bright Ecthelion</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Bright Ecthelion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your marriage.  The wife into the game as well?  Hope to see you back soon.  Have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your marriage.  The wife into the game as well?  Hope to see you back soon.  Have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by Dannicus</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dannicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! Enjoy your time touring Eurpoe :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! Enjoy your time touring Eurpoe <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On My Honeymoon! by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/on-my-honeymoon/#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! Hope you enjoy your vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! Hope you enjoy your vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Blok Starter Set Army by Wearbe</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/red-blok-starter-set-army/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Wearbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=919#comment-912</guid>
		<description>It says &quot;Red Blok Ruler&quot; on the box, but it isn&#039;t that clear-red, hard plastic thing you are thinking... it is a French translation &quot;issue&quot;... they mean a tape measure that has a yellow Red Blok symbol on the side instead of the old version that had the red Rackham serpant.

These are also not repacks nor previousely released pieces.  These are special version made for this box.  The troops have mono-chrome tan pants instead of the red and tan camo.  They are also missing the old emblems on the shoulder pads. Oden and Manon have new paint jobs, more simple, though the hair is brighter this round.  And the vehicles have slightly &quot;softer&quot; looking paint jobs.  Don&#039;t worry, though, the vehicles look fine with your old army pieces and look great with this new set.

You also get 12 dice (the normal black Rackham ones, not the Red Blok Dice Tin version), 6 low walls (like in the Damocles set) and a very brief intro set of rules and a single page tactical &quot;manual&quot; which would be better named as a tactical insert.

Your Dragonov setup has an issue... in the army box you get 2 standard komandos, 1 EWS, 1 sniper, 1 officer, and 1 medic.  You don&#039;t get any standard komandos in an attachment box which leaves you with one slot short in your 9-man team.  I suppose you could use your attachment box Gauss trooper in that slot if nobody cares at your table.

The only item that appears unchanged (beside the dice and walls) is the container.  It matches the old containers perfectly.

The best part of this box, though, is the value.  I can&#039;t believe they put a Dotch yaga in there at this price.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says &#8220;Red Blok Ruler&#8221; on the box, but it isn&#8217;t that clear-red, hard plastic thing you are thinking&#8230; it is a French translation &#8220;issue&#8221;&#8230; they mean a tape measure that has a yellow Red Blok symbol on the side instead of the old version that had the red Rackham serpant.</p>
<p>These are also not repacks nor previousely released pieces.  These are special version made for this box.  The troops have mono-chrome tan pants instead of the red and tan camo.  They are also missing the old emblems on the shoulder pads. Oden and Manon have new paint jobs, more simple, though the hair is brighter this round.  And the vehicles have slightly &#8220;softer&#8221; looking paint jobs.  Don&#8217;t worry, though, the vehicles look fine with your old army pieces and look great with this new set.</p>
<p>You also get 12 dice (the normal black Rackham ones, not the Red Blok Dice Tin version), 6 low walls (like in the Damocles set) and a very brief intro set of rules and a single page tactical &#8220;manual&#8221; which would be better named as a tactical insert.</p>
<p>Your Dragonov setup has an issue&#8230; in the army box you get 2 standard komandos, 1 EWS, 1 sniper, 1 officer, and 1 medic.  You don&#8217;t get any standard komandos in an attachment box which leaves you with one slot short in your 9-man team.  I suppose you could use your attachment box Gauss trooper in that slot if nobody cares at your table.</p>
<p>The only item that appears unchanged (beside the dice and walls) is the container.  It matches the old containers perfectly.</p>
<p>The best part of this box, though, is the value.  I can&#8217;t believe they put a Dotch yaga in there at this price.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni First Pics Revealed by LiberMortis</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-first-pics-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>LiberMortis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=959#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Oni look sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oni look sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on King Mammoth and Curtain of Flames by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/king-mammoth-and-curtain-of-flames/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=223#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Curtain of Flames blocks line of sight of any unit that draws a line through the base of the King Mammoth to its target (including the mammoth itself). This does not work in reverse as Karman units behind the curtain can shoot through it at enemies. This essentially makes the king mammoth a line of sight blocking piece of cover.

Note that you can shoot the king mammoth on overwatch when it moves as your overwatch fires before it can engage its curtain of flames again. 

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtain of Flames blocks line of sight of any unit that draws a line through the base of the King Mammoth to its target (including the mammoth itself). This does not work in reverse as Karman units behind the curtain can shoot through it at enemies. This essentially makes the king mammoth a line of sight blocking piece of cover.</p>
<p>Note that you can shoot the king mammoth on overwatch when it moves as your overwatch fires before it can engage its curtain of flames again. </p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on King Mammoth and Curtain of Flames by Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/king-mammoth-and-curtain-of-flames/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=223#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Can you please give an example of how this ability works? I picked up mine during the FFG sale and just got a chance to play it recently against a friend. There was confusion over the wording on how the rule works. Do any enemies with the curtain between them lose line of site&gt; or is it within a certain distance? Hope you can clear this up for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please give an example of how this ability works? I picked up mine during the FFG sale and just got a chance to play it recently against a friend. There was confusion over the wording on how the rule works. Do any enemies with the curtain between them lose line of site&gt; or is it within a certain distance? Hope you can clear this up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni First Pics Revealed by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-first-pics-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=959#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Agreed, I was disappointed with the COGS but ONI has me ready to put down money for another army. As soon as I saw those TacArms I knew I had to have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, I was disappointed with the COGS but ONI has me ready to put down money for another army. As soon as I saw those TacArms I knew I had to have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni First Pics Revealed by Adam Isherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-first-pics-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Isherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=959#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Really cant wait for this army - its the kinda darkness that AT43 needs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really cant wait for this army &#8211; its the kinda darkness that AT43 needs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karman K Units by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/karman-k-units/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=277#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Thanks for noticing that, I&#039;ll have a look through my other Karman posts and see if there are any other references to K-units being groundable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for noticing that, I&#8217;ll have a look through my other Karman posts and see if there are any other references to K-units being groundable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karman K Units by Silence Indigo</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/karman-k-units/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=277#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice summary of the K&#039;s, very useful for tactical army building. You might want to revise the K-Burners&#039; description for consistency in regard to their ungroundable capacity as of the 2009 rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice summary of the K&#8217;s, very useful for tactical army building. You might want to revise the K-Burners&#8217; description for consistency in regard to their ungroundable capacity as of the 2009 rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oni First Pics Revealed by TacNuke</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/oni/oni-first-pics-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>TacNuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=959#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Unleash the zombie hordes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unleash the zombie hordes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs and Red Blok Unboxing by Vénérable Zaïus</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cogs-and-red-blok-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Vénérable Zaïus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=955#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Hi, i&#039;ve also post a complet Review on the Cogs &amp; Red Blok unboxing on my website.
It&#039;s in French, but google can help you if your french isn’t what it used to be.

http://www.figouz.net/AT-43/Army_Box.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i&#8217;ve also post a complet Review on the Cogs &amp; Red Blok unboxing on my website.<br />
It&#8217;s in French, but google can help you if your french isn’t what it used to be.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.figouz.net/AT-43/Army_Box.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.figouz.net/AT-43/Army_Box.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs and Red Blok Unboxing by Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cogs-and-red-blok-unboxing/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=955#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait until august! Red Blok!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait until august! Red Blok!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fortuna Rules Released by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/fortuna-rules-released/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=948#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Yeah I should probably re-categorize the post, I don&#039;t really have a &quot;Mercenaries&quot; section. I do really like the idea that she can join any force and pilot any AFV giving it that extra survivability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I should probably re-categorize the post, I don&#8217;t really have a &#8220;Mercenaries&#8221; section. I do really like the idea that she can join any force and pilot any AFV giving it that extra survivability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fortuna Rules Released by Vladimirov</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/fortuna-rules-released/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimirov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=948#comment-892</guid>
		<description>It can be any vehicle of any type 2 army. Example: with a red block defend snake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can be any vehicle of any type 2 army. Example: with a red block defend snake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TGN Closes its Door by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/tgn-closes-its-door/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=935#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Ironic how the site is still running and Zac suddenly has time now that the site is sponsored. If he needed sponsorship to continue running the site he should have asked for sponsorship, instead of simply turning his site off in the middle of a contest he was running. This left many gamers who had signed up, bought miniatures, painted them up with the hope of winning prizes in a state of limbo. 

Shutting down a site with no warning to the sponsors that were contributing prizes, the users that had invested money in the hope of winning prizes was extremely ill thought out. In fact it appeared that no thought went into how to elegantly shut down at all. In my book one only does something like that out of pure frustration or anger hence the &quot;nerd rage&quot; moniker. If he was truly thinking of shutting the site why start a contest that required users to buy miniatures in order to enter?

Was I personally invested in said contest, yes I was. Was I venting about the extreme lack of professionalism and the feeling of being duped into a contest, that at the time, looked like it had no possibility of continuing? You bet I was. 

I appreciate your honest opinion. You may never come back to read this comment but it is nice to know there are people out there that aren&#039;t afraid to call you out on something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic how the site is still running and Zac suddenly has time now that the site is sponsored. If he needed sponsorship to continue running the site he should have asked for sponsorship, instead of simply turning his site off in the middle of a contest he was running. This left many gamers who had signed up, bought miniatures, painted them up with the hope of winning prizes in a state of limbo. </p>
<p>Shutting down a site with no warning to the sponsors that were contributing prizes, the users that had invested money in the hope of winning prizes was extremely ill thought out. In fact it appeared that no thought went into how to elegantly shut down at all. In my book one only does something like that out of pure frustration or anger hence the &#8220;nerd rage&#8221; moniker. If he was truly thinking of shutting the site why start a contest that required users to buy miniatures in order to enter?</p>
<p>Was I personally invested in said contest, yes I was. Was I venting about the extreme lack of professionalism and the feeling of being duped into a contest, that at the time, looked like it had no possibility of continuing? You bet I was. </p>
<p>I appreciate your honest opinion. You may never come back to read this comment but it is nice to know there are people out there that aren&#8217;t afraid to call you out on something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TGN Closes its Door by Puffonthis</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/tgn-closes-its-door/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Puffonthis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=935#comment-887</guid>
		<description>The guy says that he simply doesn&#039;t want to devote the time to the site anymore and you call this &quot;nerd rage frustration&quot;? 

Sounds like someone&#039;s panties got in a bunch cause his favorite gaming website is getting taken down. Yea, the guy doesn&#039;t want to do it anymore... get over it, it&#039;s his choice to make.

Sheesh, give a guy his own website and he thinks he can just barf up any delusional miss-information about anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy says that he simply doesn&#8217;t want to devote the time to the site anymore and you call this &#8220;nerd rage frustration&#8221;? </p>
<p>Sounds like someone&#8217;s panties got in a bunch cause his favorite gaming website is getting taken down. Yea, the guy doesn&#8217;t want to do it anymore&#8230; get over it, it&#8217;s his choice to make.</p>
<p>Sheesh, give a guy his own website and he thinks he can just barf up any delusional miss-information about anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-885</guid>
		<description>nice! I do the same myself since I have 2 full dragonov units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice! I do the same myself since I have 2 full dragonov units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by Chuikov</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-884</guid>
		<description>To field the 3 man Dragonov AT-Guass mobile support team I only purchased two attachment boxes and proxied the third member of the team with a regular Dragonov Commando.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To field the 3 man Dragonov AT-Guass mobile support team I only purchased two attachment boxes and proxied the third member of the team with a regular Dragonov Commando.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TGN Closes its Door by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/tgn-closes-its-door/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=935#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Not that I know of. I would imagine though that someone will pay the ransom money to have the site back up and running (Zac would likely pick up a co owner in the process). There is too much marketing value for small indie shops for them to let it disappear overnight like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I know of. I would imagine though that someone will pay the ransom money to have the site back up and running (Zac would likely pick up a co owner in the process). There is too much marketing value for small indie shops for them to let it disappear overnight like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TGN Closes its Door by bloodtofu</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/tgn-closes-its-door/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>bloodtofu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=935#comment-876</guid>
		<description>In the time I&#039;ve spent reading TGN I have learned of so many interesting games that I would have never known otherwise. It&#039;s indeed a shame now that the site is gone.

Are there other generic miniatures news sites that would sort of fill in the niche out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the time I&#8217;ve spent reading TGN I have learned of so many interesting games that I would have never known otherwise. It&#8217;s indeed a shame now that the site is gone.</p>
<p>Are there other generic miniatures news sites that would sort of fill in the niche out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TGN Closes its Door by 7times7is49</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/tgn-closes-its-door/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>7times7is49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=935#comment-875</guid>
		<description>An utter shame! He was more reliable than... anyone!!!! It shall be missed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An utter shame! He was more reliable than&#8230; anyone!!!! It shall be missed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-874</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately yes. There are rumours about Rackham redoing the attachment boxes in the near future though. This is only a rumour though and I have no idea how accurate it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately yes. There are rumours about Rackham redoing the attachment boxes in the near future though. This is only a rumour though and I have no idea how accurate it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by littlemute</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>littlemute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Is the only way to get 3 AT-Gauss guns to buy three Dragonov Attachment boxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the only way to get 3 AT-Gauss guns to buy three Dragonov Attachment boxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Even at lower point values, by taking a type III you&#039;re limiting the number of troops that can actually win you the game so it balances out. When 40% of your points are tied up in one model, there aren&#039;t going to be a whole lot of infantry and that becomes a huge weakness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even at lower point values, by taking a type III you&#8217;re limiting the number of troops that can actually win you the game so it balances out. When 40% of your points are tied up in one model, there aren&#8217;t going to be a whole lot of infantry and that becomes a huge weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 00:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-871</guid>
		<description>At first I thought the same as you, but my fears were put to rest also after playing a couple of Frostbite missions... and you are right about Gencol. As always, great articles! Keep up the good work and long live AT-43!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought the same as you, but my fears were put to rest also after playing a couple of Frostbite missions&#8230; and you are right about Gencol. As always, great articles! Keep up the good work and long live AT-43!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Type III&#8217;s and Red Blok, Pick GenCol. by adamishyrwude</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/type-iiis-and-red-blok-pick-gencol/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>adamishyrwude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=930#comment-869</guid>
		<description>when i saw the inclusion of type 3s i was worried they would dominate the battlefield like so many other scifi games with nasty armour.

Sounds like the game was a blast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i saw the inclusion of type 3s i was worried they would dominate the battlefield like so many other scifi games with nasty armour.</p>
<p>Sounds like the game was a blast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infinity Pool Beta by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/infinity-pool-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=928#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Come Back!!!! We miss your articles!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come Back!!!! We miss your articles!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on salon du jeu de société de Paris by MechaBeast</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/salon-du-jeu-de-societe-de-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>MechaBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=923#comment-860</guid>
		<description>I think i threw up a little looking at the cog AFVs especially the rear of the vandal.  The stats are awesome though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think i threw up a little looking at the cog AFVs especially the rear of the vandal.  The stats are awesome though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on salon du jeu de société de Paris by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/salon-du-jeu-de-societe-de-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=923#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Some really cool pics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some really cool pics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Blok Starter Set Army by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/red-blok-starter-set-army/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=919#comment-858</guid>
		<description>yup, you&#039;ve got it. The box will include a tape measure, blast template, containers and low wall sections. 6 of the red blok army dice and the measurement ruler should also be in the box as well. You will be able to pick up one of these armies and have everything you need to play in the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, you&#8217;ve got it. The box will include a tape measure, blast template, containers and low wall sections. 6 of the red blok army dice and the measurement ruler should also be in the box as well. You will be able to pick up one of these armies and have everything you need to play in the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Blok Starter Set Army by AvatarArt</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/red-blok-starter-set-army/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>AvatarArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=919#comment-857</guid>
		<description>So is this starter set just a collection of previously released pieces?
Is the idea here its a &#039;bulk buy&#039; so you save a few bucks?
Will there be any terrain pieces included?

Thanks,

Steve G.
Project Manager
AvatarArt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is this starter set just a collection of previously released pieces?<br />
Is the idea here its a &#8216;bulk buy&#8217; so you save a few bucks?<br />
Will there be any terrain pieces included?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Steve G.<br />
Project Manager<br />
AvatarArt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Blok Starter Set Army by Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/red-blok-starter-set-army/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=919#comment-851</guid>
		<description>@ 7times7is49 

Ha! too late....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 7times7is49 </p>
<p>Ha! too late&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Blok Starter Set Army by 7times7is49</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/red-blok-starter-set-army/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>7times7is49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=919#comment-850</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve sold me on that point holder combo. 

Now if only I can take this post down so no one can ever see it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve sold me on that point holder combo. </p>
<p>Now if only I can take this post down so no one can ever see it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wendigo Beginner Painting Guide by Mike OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/wendigo-beginner-painting-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=916#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. I also have a tendency to work on the bases by putting on the appropriate flock. It really helps the pre-paints, along the other figs. My Em4 figs look okay but throw on a bit of flock and some black and grey to bring out an asphalt look and the SWAT troops look better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. I also have a tendency to work on the bases by putting on the appropriate flock. It really helps the pre-paints, along the other figs. My Em4 figs look okay but throw on a bit of flock and some black and grey to bring out an asphalt look and the SWAT troops look better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-848</guid>
		<description>I know how you feel about Red Blok. I love playing them because of how survivable they are. Throw a ton of models at your opponent and some of them are bound to get into shooting range. The Cogs look like their units will be composed similarly to the Karmans. As for look its definitely one of those love it or hate it things. I really like the infantry but really dislike the type *** AFV. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know how you feel about Red Blok. I love playing them because of how survivable they are. Throw a ton of models at your opponent and some of them are bound to get into shooting range. The Cogs look like their units will be composed similarly to the Karmans. As for look its definitely one of those love it or hate it things. I really like the infantry but really dislike the type *** AFV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by MechaBeast</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>MechaBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Ugh Im torn.  Ive wanted to play the cogs as my second army as soon as i saw their infantry but i just dont agree with the design of their 2 afv&#039;s and high point cost low numbers.  Just look at all you get with the red block army.  Sure they cant hit the broad side of a barn but the special weapons are maxxed out plus officers and medics/engies/mechanics and there is still a lot of clearance out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh Im torn.  Ive wanted to play the cogs as my second army as soon as i saw their infantry but i just dont agree with the design of their 2 afv&#8217;s and high point cost low numbers.  Just look at all you get with the red block army.  Sure they cant hit the broad side of a barn but the special weapons are maxxed out plus officers and medics/engies/mechanics and there is still a lot of clearance out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-846</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that the RB starter box is basically a 2,000 point vanilla platoon build.  So maybe the Cogs starter is the same?  8 troops, 3 heroes and 2 AFVs = 2k army for Cogs, which means for once the Karmans won&#039;t find themselves heavily outnumbered on the battlefield :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that the RB starter box is basically a 2,000 point vanilla platoon build.  So maybe the Cogs starter is the same?  8 troops, 3 heroes and 2 AFVs = 2k army for Cogs, which means for once the Karmans won&#8217;t find themselves heavily outnumbered on the battlefield <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by Silence Indigo</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-845</guid>
		<description>This is very good news indeed! Thanks to the AT-43 Addict!

The cog fighters are taller than the containers, making them quite impressive on the battlefield. Ironically, the container and walls are useless for the cogs, since it provides no cover to them (special cog rule) and it does not block of sight, being smaller than the fighers. It does provide high ground for shooters, though.

Also, after trying the units of the Cog Army Box with the Easy AT-43 software, it appears that with that box&#039;s composition, only the generic Cog army profile can be selected as a faction : 

- All heroes belong to the C-Naps faction, which can only be used with a generic army or the C-Naps faction;
- The first section slot required (!) for a C-Naps army is *** Infantry (e.g. Hunters), which are not included in this set.

Furthermore, it is infortunate that no unit can include special weapon bearers, which are only available to the cogs at full unit numbers (for a very high AP cost).

Nevertheless, I&#039;ve got to get my hands on those!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good news indeed! Thanks to the AT-43 Addict!</p>
<p>The cog fighters are taller than the containers, making them quite impressive on the battlefield. Ironically, the container and walls are useless for the cogs, since it provides no cover to them (special cog rule) and it does not block of sight, being smaller than the fighers. It does provide high ground for shooters, though.</p>
<p>Also, after trying the units of the Cog Army Box with the Easy AT-43 software, it appears that with that box&#8217;s composition, only the generic Cog army profile can be selected as a faction : </p>
<p>- All heroes belong to the C-Naps faction, which can only be used with a generic army or the C-Naps faction;<br />
- The first section slot required (!) for a C-Naps army is *** Infantry (e.g. Hunters), which are not included in this set.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it is infortunate that no unit can include special weapon bearers, which are only available to the cogs at full unit numbers (for a very high AP cost).</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I&#8217;ve got to get my hands on those!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by Nevan</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Being in the US, this will be a great buy since I play Red.  Not to mention I might just pick up the COG, since I like what I&#039;ve seen of that so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in the US, this will be a great buy since I play Red.  Not to mention I might just pick up the COG, since I like what I&#8217;ve seen of that so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Same here... I need the DY anxdc maybe some more Kasnye are good... and the COgs look great... for 70 USA I can order form Europe and still be cheaper...GREAT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here&#8230; I need the DY anxdc maybe some more Kasnye are good&#8230; and the COgs look great&#8230; for 70 USA I can order form Europe and still be cheaper&#8230;GREAT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-842</guid>
		<description>Yeah its hard to say whether these boxes are priced as a loss leader or not. I will definitely be picking them up though, I don&#039;t have a DY yet and I want some cogs to play around with. At 70 MSRP (likely available for less than 60) There is no way I could pass this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah its hard to say whether these boxes are priced as a loss leader or not. I will definitely be picking them up though, I don&#8217;t have a DY yet and I want some cogs to play around with. At 70 MSRP (likely available for less than 60) There is no way I could pass this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introductory Army Sets in June by SirDIdymus</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/introductory-army-sets-in-june/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>SirDIdymus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=913#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Indeed it is a good move and I hope they do that for the rest of the armies. *but* hopefully they won&#039;t make the boxes too self sufficient or else you&#039;ll have people *just* buy the army boxes and nothing else. Kinda like the WHFB battalion boxes, these armies hopefully will be the beginning and not an end.

If they are making a profit off the boxes it kinda confirms that the minis at the current price point were a wee bit jacked up in price, tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is a good move and I hope they do that for the rest of the armies. *but* hopefully they won&#8217;t make the boxes too self sufficient or else you&#8217;ll have people *just* buy the army boxes and nothing else. Kinda like the WHFB battalion boxes, these armies hopefully will be the beginning and not an end.</p>
<p>If they are making a profit off the boxes it kinda confirms that the minis at the current price point were a wee bit jacked up in price, tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hekat Summoning &#8211; The Creation Routine by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/hekat-summoning-the-creation-routine/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=219#comment-734</guid>
		<description>This was an update to the rules, it was proving a bit overpowered to have any AFV officer (or any officer in a cypher list) able to create a Hekat.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=3639&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;. So now only the company commander can use the creation routine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an update to the rules, it was proving a bit overpowered to have any AFV officer (or any officer in a cypher list) able to create a Hekat.  <a href="http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=3639" rel="nofollow">source</a>. So now only the company commander can use the creation routine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hekat Summoning &#8211; The Creation Routine by Universal Head</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/hekat-summoning-the-creation-routine/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Universal Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=219#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t Creation be used by an AFV overseer to create a new AFV in contact with it? I can&#039;t find the rule that says it can only be used by a Commander...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t Creation be used by an AFV overseer to create a new AFV in contact with it? I can&#8217;t find the rule that says it can only be used by a Commander&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Therian 2000 Point Starter List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/therian-2000-point-starter-list/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=266#comment-719</guid>
		<description>I would increase the size of the grim golem unit to use up any leftover points. Each extra fighter gives you another 2 dice to roll in melee. Doing so would require another box of grim golems though (which you&#039;ll likely end up wanting at some point anyways for a full strength stealthed unit)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would increase the size of the grim golem unit to use up any leftover points. Each extra fighter gives you another 2 dice to roll in melee. Doing so would require another box of grim golems though (which you&#8217;ll likely end up wanting at some point anyways for a full strength stealthed unit)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Ranged Cypher List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/2000-point-ranged-cypher-list/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=899#comment-718</guid>
		<description>That was a typo, it should have been talking about the omega. Should be less confusing now .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a typo, it should have been talking about the omega. Should be less confusing now .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Therian 2000 Point Starter List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/therian-2000-point-starter-list/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=266#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Unlessy maths are wrong I make the Tiamat version of this list only 1900 ap. Any suggestions on how to spend the 100ap? Urash would be pointless as he can&#039;t use his special Fusion routine when not Company Commander.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlessy maths are wrong I make the Tiamat version of this list only 1900 ap. Any suggestions on how to spend the 100ap? Urash would be pointless as he can&#8217;t use his special Fusion routine when not Company Commander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Ranged Cypher List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/2000-point-ranged-cypher-list/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=899#comment-716</guid>
		<description>The text mentions a Sigma leader but I don&#039;t see it in the army list - is something missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text mentions a Sigma leader but I don&#8217;t see it in the army list &#8211; is something missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-714</guid>
		<description>RE the extra 500 ap, the mammoth curtain of flames wouldn&#039;t be as beneficial to this list, but the firepower more than makes up for it. Give it a go though, the mammoth firepower is very powerful. I would try to increase the number of models though for the points myself, more targets to shoot at is always good. Maybe some Jungle trikes, or another jungle/king buggy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE the extra 500 ap, the mammoth curtain of flames wouldn&#8217;t be as beneficial to this list, but the firepower more than makes up for it. Give it a go though, the mammoth firepower is very powerful. I would try to increase the number of models though for the points myself, more targets to shoot at is always good. Maybe some Jungle trikes, or another jungle/king buggy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Without something that moves fast with flamers, infantry has very little to be afraid of. The King buggy can be used to quickly eliminate infantry based threats. More easy trikes are definitely an option though, but might be too anti afv heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without something that moves fast with flamers, infantry has very little to be afraid of. The King buggy can be used to quickly eliminate infantry based threats. More easy trikes are definitely an option though, but might be too anti afv heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Why the King Buggy? Wouldn&#039;t more ETs serve Anuman better?

My group&#039;s settled on playing at 2500ap. What would you do with the extra 500ap? I&#039;d upgrade the Buggy to a Mammoth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the King Buggy? Wouldn&#8217;t more ETs serve Anuman better?</p>
<p>My group&#8217;s settled on playing at 2500ap. What would you do with the extra 500ap? I&#8217;d upgrade the Buggy to a Mammoth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-711</guid>
		<description>yes a heavy infantry list would be the best way to defeat this. Anti AFV Supra, Morningstar lists would be hard to beat for instance. 

Thats part of the beauty of AT43, you can build a specialized list to utterly stomp an opponents strategy, but your list is just as easily countered.

These new lists are less beginner lists, they aren&#039;t the jack of all trade armies that you should start with, but an example of some highly specialized lists that excel at a particular strategy. 

If you have an opponent that loves running frontline or Mind for instance this is a perfect way to take them down a notch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes a heavy infantry list would be the best way to defeat this. Anti AFV Supra, Morningstar lists would be hard to beat for instance. </p>
<p>Thats part of the beauty of AT43, you can build a specialized list to utterly stomp an opponents strategy, but your list is just as easily countered.</p>
<p>These new lists are less beginner lists, they aren&#8217;t the jack of all trade armies that you should start with, but an example of some highly specialized lists that excel at a particular strategy. </p>
<p>If you have an opponent that loves running frontline or Mind for instance this is a perfect way to take them down a notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2000 Point AT43 Karman Flux List by Silence Indigo</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/2000-point-karman-flux-list/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=883#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Seems like a very devastating list! I&#039;m eager to try this one!

But would it not be very vulnerable to anti-AFV infantry units, such as Bane Goliaths or Dragomirov Kolossus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a very devastating list! I&#8217;m eager to try this one!</p>
<p>But would it not be very vulnerable to anti-AFV infantry units, such as Bane Goliaths or Dragomirov Kolossus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laser Designation Changed&#8230; Again by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/laser-designation-changed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=867#comment-706</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re correct, but there was a rule clarification made previous to this one that changed how laser tagging worked. The previous ruling made it difficult to keep track of which units were &quot;tagged&quot;. This ruling (more in line with what it says in the rulebook) streamlines play and removes a lot of opportunity for disagreement whether a unit can be tagged or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re correct, but there was a rule clarification made previous to this one that changed how laser tagging worked. The previous ruling made it difficult to keep track of which units were &#8220;tagged&#8221;. This ruling (more in line with what it says in the rulebook) streamlines play and removes a lot of opportunity for disagreement whether a unit can be tagged or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Laser Designation Changed&#8230; Again by Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/laser-designation-changed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=867#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am wrong, but didnt in the UNA book says that the designators can designate a &quot;unit&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am wrong, but didnt in the UNA book says that the designators can designate a &#8220;unit&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Prowler Preview by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-prowler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=856#comment-702</guid>
		<description>Its at type * AFV, they should be summonable during battle like the Therians can do with Hekats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its at type * AFV, they should be summonable during battle like the Therians can do with Hekats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Prowler Preview by TacNuke</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-prowler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>TacNuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=856#comment-701</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s this thing&#039;s classification.  Is it a battlearmor/TacArm, or a AFV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s this thing&#8217;s classification.  Is it a battlearmor/TacArm, or a AFV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs Tacarms by Silence Undugi</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-tacarms/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Undugi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=844#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip! Looking forward to them, despite the cost they&#039;ll be likely to represent... I&#039;m uneasy though with paying 15$ USD+shipping per 2&quot; figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip! Looking forward to them, despite the cost they&#8217;ll be likely to represent&#8230; I&#8217;m uneasy though with paying 15$ USD+shipping per 2&#8243; figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack! Scenario by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/attack-scenario/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=851#comment-682</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to try it out as well. I&#039;ve played a lot of similar tile based &quot;king of the hill&quot; type games, but not at 3k points. With a larger board you might see some interesting tactics in play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to try it out as well. I&#8217;ve played a lot of similar tile based &#8220;king of the hill&#8221; type games, but not at 3k points. With a larger board you might see some interesting tactics in play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs Tacarms by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-tacarms/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=844#comment-681</guid>
		<description>The Figures here are standard fighters, I&#039;m not sure if these are pictures of the production minis or if they have been retouched by a painter. I got the pictures from the latest CHO and it didn&#039;t specify. 

The Cogs standard infantry (Warmongers for instance) seem to come in boxes of 4 much like the karmans. I would think that they will be packaged similarly for their full range.

These guys will come in units of 2 much like the karman K-units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Figures here are standard fighters, I&#8217;m not sure if these are pictures of the production minis or if they have been retouched by a painter. I got the pictures from the latest CHO and it didn&#8217;t specify. </p>
<p>The Cogs standard infantry (Warmongers for instance) seem to come in boxes of 4 much like the karmans. I would think that they will be packaged similarly for their full range.</p>
<p>These guys will come in units of 2 much like the karman K-units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs Tacarms by Silence Indigo</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-tacarms/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Indigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=844#comment-680</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a wonderful preview! I&#039;m curious and eager to see more of this beautiful line, with the addition of a new species to the AT-43 world! I can hardly imagine, though, how they could be fighting the UNA the way they&#039;re depicted by the Muse agency (&quot;a peaceful species&quot; and &quot;an economic partner&quot;.)

Do you know by any luck: 
1-if these figures shown here are to be heroes, or classical fighters?
2-if the painting we see is &quot;final&quot; or a high-grade showcase by Rackham?
3-if the cog armies are to include some relatively large units boxes (e.g. 5+figures per box)?

Thanks!

Silence Indigo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a wonderful preview! I&#8217;m curious and eager to see more of this beautiful line, with the addition of a new species to the AT-43 world! I can hardly imagine, though, how they could be fighting the UNA the way they&#8217;re depicted by the Muse agency (&#8220;a peaceful species&#8221; and &#8220;an economic partner&#8221;.)</p>
<p>Do you know by any luck:<br />
1-if these figures shown here are to be heroes, or classical fighters?<br />
2-if the painting we see is &#8220;final&#8221; or a high-grade showcase by Rackham?<br />
3-if the cog armies are to include some relatively large units boxes (e.g. 5+figures per box)?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Silence Indigo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Prowler Preview by Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-prowler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=856#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Even though I like it, im still a bit dissapointed once compared to the art work,.... the mini looks ok but the bigh block thing on the &quot;chest&quot; is strange</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I like it, im still a bit dissapointed once compared to the art work,&#8230;. the mini looks ok but the bigh block thing on the &#8220;chest&#8221; is strange</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack! Scenario by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/attack-scenario/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=851#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I just picked the tiles up Sunday, so I could play Frostbite. Now I&#039;m looking forward to using them for this scenario!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just picked the tiles up Sunday, so I could play Frostbite. Now I&#8217;m looking forward to using them for this scenario!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Hunters Preview by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-hunters-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=825#comment-659</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right. That extends their range even farther. These guys are going to be scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right. That extends their range even farther. These guys are going to be scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on new comic out by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-comic-out/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=837#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Hunters Preview by Wolfen</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-hunters-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=825#comment-651</guid>
		<description>And dont forget they all have re-roll 1 and add a hero (dunno if it is possible) and add fire at will drill.... I want COGS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And dont forget they all have re-roll 1 and add a hero (dunno if it is possible) and add fire at will drill&#8230;. I want COGS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Cogs Hunters Preview by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/cogs/cogs-hunters-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=825#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I am eagerly awaiting these guys! Can&#039;t wait to see them in action!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am eagerly awaiting these guys! Can&#8217;t wait to see them in action!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP and RP Strategy by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/vp-and-rp-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=719#comment-608</guid>
		<description>They absolutely can. Put guru lucius with some anakongas armed with flamers. They can quickly reach a centrally contested VP location, their stealth will keep them protected and the flamers and drum guns will fend off the enemy. Use a smaller unit of wendigos keep them out of line of sight to grab another location.

Arceo with jamers and jindo is a nasty combo with this list as well as the captured AFV&#039;s can suddenly control points too. turning an empty RP/VP  point on the opposite side of the board into one you control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They absolutely can. Put guru lucius with some anakongas armed with flamers. They can quickly reach a centrally contested VP location, their stealth will keep them protected and the flamers and drum guns will fend off the enemy. Use a smaller unit of wendigos keep them out of line of sight to grab another location.</p>
<p>Arceo with jamers and jindo is a nasty combo with this list as well as the captured AFV&#8217;s can suddenly control points too. turning an empty RP/VP  point on the opposite side of the board into one you control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP and RP Strategy by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/vp-and-rp-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=719#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Can armies with expensive, fragile units-- like Karmans-- convincingly threaten a VP blitz? Or is the pain of each lost unit so high that their point holders won&#039;t keep the enemy away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can armies with expensive, fragile units&#8211; like Karmans&#8211; convincingly threaten a VP blitz? Or is the pain of each lost unit so high that their point holders won&#8217;t keep the enemy away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tiamat, a Therian Menace by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/tiamat-a-therian-menace/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=656#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Thanks for answering this one busby. I must have missed this one last week. As busby has said there are 2 versions of dash, one for infantry that lets them cover 30cm as a rush movement and one for AFVs which lets them cover 50cm as a rush. In both cases the routine costs 2 LP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for answering this one busby. I must have missed this one last week. As busby has said there are 2 versions of dash, one for infantry that lets them cover 30cm as a rush movement and one for AFVs which lets them cover 50cm as a rush. In both cases the routine costs 2 LP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tiamat, a Therian Menace by busby</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/tiamat-a-therian-menace/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>busby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=656#comment-597</guid>
		<description>rabidaskal, you wanted to know:  The maneuver you are thinking of is the infantry rush that Therians have, allowing them to move a total of 30cm.  The AFV version of that: Dash, allows vehicles to move 50cm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rabidaskal, you wanted to know:  The maneuver you are thinking of is the infantry rush that Therians have, allowing them to move a total of 30cm.  The AFV version of that: Dash, allows vehicles to move 50cm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New At43Comic: March 3rd by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-at43comic-march-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=724#comment-596</guid>
		<description>ugh long day, its fixed now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugh long day, its fixed now <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New At43Comic: March 3rd by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-at43comic-march-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=724#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Also, there isn&#039;t a hyphen in my URL....it&#039;s just www.at43comic.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there isn&#8217;t a hyphen in my URL&#8230;.it&#8217;s just <a href="http://www.at43comic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.at43comic.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New At43Comic: March 3rd by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-at43comic-march-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=724#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Unit Cards Complete by AT-43: The Comic &#187; Archive &#187; Great Looking Card Alternatives</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/update-unit-cards-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>AT-43: The Comic &#187; Archive &#187; Great Looking Card Alternatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=704#comment-592</guid>
		<description>[...] AT-43Addict.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AT-43Addict.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP and RP Strategy by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/vp-and-rp-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=719#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Yet another fantastic write up! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another fantastic write up! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Unit Cards Complete by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/update-unit-cards-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=704#comment-586</guid>
		<description>Thanks, silly paste, its fixed now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, silly paste, its fixed now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update: Unit Cards Complete by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/update-unit-cards-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=704#comment-585</guid>
		<description>I think the link is wrong?  Double http coming out.  Great work on the cards though, woohoo ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the link is wrong?  Double http coming out.  Great work on the cards though, woohoo ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Looking Better by Gallant</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-looking-better/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Gallant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=432#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following this since the beginning and I agree with your statements.  As a 40K player who just got sick of that game during the mess that was 4th Ed, I drifted over to AT-43 and bought some models and proxied others to try it out.  Needless to say I was impressed, but the prices were a bit high and the company a bit too distant to feel good about.  While I could afford the minis, I could see that many young players would be intimidated at a new and somewhat costly game. 

 With this sale and a clear effort on the part of Rackham to reach out, I&#039;m optimistic in a way I wasn&#039;t last year.  AT-43 really could be primed for a breakout.  Let&#039;s hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following this since the beginning and I agree with your statements.  As a 40K player who just got sick of that game during the mess that was 4th Ed, I drifted over to AT-43 and bought some models and proxied others to try it out.  Needless to say I was impressed, but the prices were a bit high and the company a bit too distant to feel good about.  While I could afford the minis, I could see that many young players would be intimidated at a new and somewhat costly game. </p>
<p> With this sale and a clear effort on the part of Rackham to reach out, I&#8217;m optimistic in a way I wasn&#8217;t last year.  AT-43 really could be primed for a breakout.  Let&#8217;s hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide Darius by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/guide-darius/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=596#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Good question. Since Tiamat is an AFV she uses the AFV version of the Dash routine. This lets any AFV cover up to 50 cm. Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. Since Tiamat is an AFV she uses the AFV version of the Dash routine. This lets any AFV cover up to 50 cm. Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tiamat, a Therian Menace by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/tiamat-a-therian-menace/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=656#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I&#039;m kinda new and not familiar with the armies, how does Tiamat cover 50cm with Dash?  I thought Dash let Therian units travel &#039;up to 30cm.&#039;  Does that mean that dashing Therians get +30cm to regular movement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m kinda new and not familiar with the armies, how does Tiamat cover 50cm with Dash?  I thought Dash let Therian units travel &#8216;up to 30cm.&#8217;  Does that mean that dashing Therians get +30cm to regular movement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide Darius by Wolflord</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/guide-darius/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolflord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=596#comment-563</guid>
		<description>I agree that this was a terrible call from R.  I think pretty much everyone will be ruling that he joins Kaptars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this was a terrible call from R.  I think pretty much everyone will be ruling that he joins Kaptars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Combat Engineers by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/at-43-combat-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=681#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Right you are, I hardly use my spetsnatz, maybe I should add them into the rotation and give them another go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are, I hardly use my spetsnatz, maybe I should add them into the rotation and give them another go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Combat Engineers by Midnight_Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/at-43-combat-engineers/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Midnight_Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=681#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Spetsnatz Kommandos get them, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spetsnatz Kommandos get them, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tiamat, a Therian Menace by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/tiamat-a-therian-menace/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=656#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really enjoying this series. It&#039;s a fun way to peek at those other armies and good for IDing which units must die. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really enjoying this series. It&#8217;s a fun way to peek at those other armies and good for IDing which units must die. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Errata Section Released by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/errata-section-released/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=480#comment-557</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also a big fan-- thanks for stepping up and compiling this data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also a big fan&#8211; thanks for stepping up and compiling this data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Krasnye and RPG Soldaty by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/krasnye-and-rpg-soldaty/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=509#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Thanks Blue Dane, let that one slip through! thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Blue Dane, let that one slip through! thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Krasnye and RPG Soldaty by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/krasnye-and-rpg-soldaty/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=509#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Great article, vastatum. There is a typo on the second paragraph of the Krasnye Soldaty. They have mechanics, not engineers. You could delete this post if you want. Love what you&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, vastatum. There is a typo on the second paragraph of the Krasnye Soldaty. They have mechanics, not engineers. You could delete this post if you want. Love what you&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide Darius by Sean Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/karmans/guide-darius/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=596#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I just got my copy of Darius the other day from FFG.  I put him in with my Kaptors without looking at the card.  I agree, makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my copy of Darius the other day from FFG.  I put him in with my Kaptors without looking at the card.  I agree, makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Errata Section Released by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/errata-section-released/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=480#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Thanks, glad you like the new addition. After the success of the &quot;getting started&quot; section (the most viewed page by far) I thought I would tackle the next thing on my laundry list of &quot;things that rackham should have done&quot;. An errata section that made sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, glad you like the new addition. After the success of the &#8220;getting started&#8221; section (the most viewed page by far) I thought I would tackle the next thing on my laundry list of &#8220;things that rackham should have done&#8221;. An errata section that made sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Errata Section Released by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/errata-section-released/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=480#comment-535</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea! This site keeps getting better and better. Good thinking and great job vastatum. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea! This site keeps getting better and better. Good thinking and great job vastatum. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking Forward by Exonn</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/looking-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Exonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=436#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I would buy more AT-43 miniatures if:

they were a bit cheaper
it was available at my local shop


You wuld&#039;not belive how hard it is to get what you want in Lithuania... :( i was waiting for my rule book more than a month.. :(
And the price is too hi for a new game (its a new game in Lithuania) its hard to atract new players becouse of hi prices and wery few minis in stock. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would buy more AT-43 miniatures if:</p>
<p>they were a bit cheaper<br />
it was available at my local shop</p>
<p>You wuld&#8217;not belive how hard it is to get what you want in Lithuania&#8230; <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  i was waiting for my rule book more than a month.. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And the price is too hi for a new game (its a new game in Lithuania) its hard to atract new players becouse of hi prices and wery few minis in stock. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amazing Cards and Tokens by indygamer</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/amazing-cards-and-tokens/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>indygamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=409#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Actually, you have it backwards.  UH made the reference guide first, then he designed the tokens and cards.  He&#039;s got some skills, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you have it backwards.  UH made the reference guide first, then he designed the tokens and cards.  He&#8217;s got some skills, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun With Frontline by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/fun-with-frontline/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=389#comment-527</guid>
		<description>you are right you would have a very low LP pool for the first turn. The goal of deploying like this though is to be able to grab enough RP points first turn to have urod come in second turn its a bit of a risk vs reward situation. for a more standard split I would leave the dragonovs with AT-Gauss and 1 sierp in reinforcement, the thinking being that you want the hussar on from turn one to take advantage of the missile launcher and getting the snipers into position first turn is essential so they can start using their sniper ability. AT-gauss is viable from the turn they enter the board. since your vehicles can hold points getting 310 - 510 points of RP first turn isn&#039;t much of a problem and you should have your full army on the table turn 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right you would have a very low LP pool for the first turn. The goal of deploying like this though is to be able to grab enough RP points first turn to have urod come in second turn its a bit of a risk vs reward situation. for a more standard split I would leave the dragonovs with AT-Gauss and 1 sierp in reinforcement, the thinking being that you want the hussar on from turn one to take advantage of the missile launcher and getting the snipers into position first turn is essential so they can start using their sniper ability. AT-gauss is viable from the turn they enter the board. since your vehicles can hold points getting 310 &#8211; 510 points of RP first turn isn&#8217;t much of a problem and you should have your full army on the table turn 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun With Frontline by Francis Traver (BlueSteelUNA)</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/red-blok/fun-with-frontline/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Traver (BlueSteelUNA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=389#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Quick question who acts as your CC if Urod is in your reinforcement pool? It seem that your LPs would be limited greatly without the O-1 and O-2 Colonels. If they deploy what would your suggested split be for a 1500/500 Assualt?

Love your website! Keep up the great work!

Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question who acts as your CC if Urod is in your reinforcement pool? It seem that your LPs would be limited greatly without the O-1 and O-2 Colonels. If they deploy what would your suggested split be for a 1500/500 Assualt?</p>
<p>Love your website! Keep up the great work!</p>
<p>Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amazing Cards and Tokens by Sean Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/amazing-cards-and-tokens/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=409#comment-524</guid>
		<description>These are really nice.  I hope he is able (and willing) to post them.  The token idea is a really great one..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are really nice.  I hope he is able (and willing) to post them.  The token idea is a really great one..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by Cairnius</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-523</guid>
		<description>I think that LGS are becoming less and less relevant when it comes to product sales.  Almost everything you can purchase in a LGS you can purchase online for enough of a discount to warrant purchasing off &quot;teh intrawebs.&quot;   Our hobbies are massively expensive, and in this economy, discounts become particularly important.

LGS are still relevant for play areas...but now we have the conundrum.

The only reason for a LGS to provide play areas is if the players are purchasing product from the LGS.

Some people are willing to spend a little extra coin to support their LGS.   Myself, I only pick up things like paints, or if I need a single box of models such that the shipping cost I would pay equates to the savings off the retail price such that I may as well give the LGS my business, and it most certainly means more to them.

But for large purchases?   I go straight to The War Store when I am starting a new army and need a large number of units all at once to get them on the table.

One of the things I did very quickly after getting into tabletop wargaming was to build my own table for play at home.   It is not very difficult: two 2&#039; by 4&#039; pieces of MDF, some paint, a bunch of wood glue, some brushes, and some sand.   Takes a few hours.   Done.   

Of course, with AT-43&#039;s gaming tiles and all our containers and walls thrown in, you don&#039;t even need the table built.   Throw down a poster to mark the play area, place your terrain, and get to rolling dice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that LGS are becoming less and less relevant when it comes to product sales.  Almost everything you can purchase in a LGS you can purchase online for enough of a discount to warrant purchasing off &#8220;teh intrawebs.&#8221;   Our hobbies are massively expensive, and in this economy, discounts become particularly important.</p>
<p>LGS are still relevant for play areas&#8230;but now we have the conundrum.</p>
<p>The only reason for a LGS to provide play areas is if the players are purchasing product from the LGS.</p>
<p>Some people are willing to spend a little extra coin to support their LGS.   Myself, I only pick up things like paints, or if I need a single box of models such that the shipping cost I would pay equates to the savings off the retail price such that I may as well give the LGS my business, and it most certainly means more to them.</p>
<p>But for large purchases?   I go straight to The War Store when I am starting a new army and need a large number of units all at once to get them on the table.</p>
<p>One of the things I did very quickly after getting into tabletop wargaming was to build my own table for play at home.   It is not very difficult: two 2&#8242; by 4&#8242; pieces of MDF, some paint, a bunch of wood glue, some brushes, and some sand.   Takes a few hours.   Done.   </p>
<p>Of course, with AT-43&#8217;s gaming tiles and all our containers and walls thrown in, you don&#8217;t even need the table built.   Throw down a poster to mark the play area, place your terrain, and get to rolling dice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grim Golems &#8211; Slice and Dice by Sean Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/grim-golems-slice-and-dice/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=383#comment-522</guid>
		<description>I am really thinking I should build up a Therian force while FFG still has their sale.  I have grabbed up Karmens and some enhancements for my UNA.  Reading this makes me think I should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really thinking I should build up a Therian force while FFG still has their sale.  I have grabbed up Karmens and some enhancements for my UNA.  Reading this makes me think I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Comic at at43comic by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-comic-at-at43comic/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=386#comment-521</guid>
		<description>This one was a pure fluke, really I&#039;m not stalking you or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one was a pure fluke, really I&#8217;m not stalking you or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Comic at at43comic by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-comic-at-at43comic/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=386#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Wow that was fast!  I just posted this a few minutes ago!  You&#039;re really on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that was fast!  I just posted this a few minutes ago!  You&#8217;re really on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At-43 Sales Updated by AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=376#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Well put busby. I would say the environment that the LGS provides goes way beyond what you can get &quot;nerding it up&quot; at someone&#039;s house (we use the same term here too). Nerding it up does have its advantages though. You can enjoy a nice pint of beer and you get to choose what tunes get played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put busby. I would say the environment that the LGS provides goes way beyond what you can get &#8220;nerding it up&#8221; at someone&#8217;s house (we use the same term here too). Nerding it up does have its advantages though. You can enjoy a nice pint of beer and you get to choose what tunes get played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by busby</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>busby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the LGS is still a very valid place to congregate at.  It isn&#039;t always as easy for a group of players to get together in their own homes and &#039;nerd&#039; it up (as some of us put it locally). Having a LGS to hang out at, buy a few immediately needed items, and generally have fun is definitely still a requirement, at least for me.


Besides, unlike a previous poster, my LGS is up for supporting any games that the locals decide to suddenly take up/try out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the LGS is still a very valid place to congregate at.  It isn&#8217;t always as easy for a group of players to get together in their own homes and &#8216;nerd&#8217; it up (as some of us put it locally). Having a LGS to hang out at, buy a few immediately needed items, and generally have fun is definitely still a requirement, at least for me.</p>
<p>Besides, unlike a previous poster, my LGS is up for supporting any games that the locals decide to suddenly take up/try out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-508</guid>
		<description>LGS aren&#039;t relevant for me anymore, cause they don&#039;t support the games I want to play =p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGS aren&#8217;t relevant for me anymore, cause they don&#8217;t support the games I want to play =p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At-43 Sales Updated by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=376#comment-507</guid>
		<description>Miniature Market has also started selling individual figures:

http://miniaturemarket.com/at_43_bitz

All these online sales are driving me craaaaazy~!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miniature Market has also started selling individual figures:</p>
<p><a href="http://miniaturemarket.com/at_43_bitz" rel="nofollow">http://miniaturemarket.com/at_43_bitz</a></p>
<p>All these online sales are driving me craaaaazy~!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Gaming Stores Still Relevant? by Goreshade</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/are-gaming-stores-still-relevant/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Goreshade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=374#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I think that LGS aren&#039;t as relevant but are still the better model for the sake of a gaming community.  Unfortunately, it doesn&#039;t seem to be a great business to be in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that LGS aren&#8217;t as relevant but are still the better model for the sake of a gaming community.  Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be a great business to be in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Number of the Beast by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/number-of-the-beast/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=372#comment-505</guid>
		<description>Agreed, this is a sign to play even more ::evil grin::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, this is a sign to play even more ::evil grin::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Number of the Beast by ScottM</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/number-of-the-beast/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=372#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Nah-- it&#039;s a sin not to play it as often as possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah&#8211; it&#8217;s a sin not to play it as often as possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Number of the Beast by AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/number-of-the-beast/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.at-43addict.com/?p=372#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I saw that too!  Haha.  Maybe it&#039;s a sin to play this game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that too!  Haha.  Maybe it&#8217;s a sin to play this game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-501</guid>
		<description>I definately in favour of the new layout, not that the old one was bad either
I think both colour schemes work well too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definately in favour of the new layout, not that the old one was bad either<br />
I think both colour schemes work well too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I like the new layout too. The new colors don&#039;t disturb me as much, but I&#039;m not going to storm the gates to demand them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new layout too. The new colors don&#8217;t disturb me as much, but I&#8217;m not going to storm the gates to demand them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Like the new layout, but prefer old colors.  The white is a bit &quot;in your face.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the new layout, but prefer old colors.  The white is a bit &#8220;in your face.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I like the new layout better, but the old one wasn&#039;t bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new layout better, but the old one wasn&#8217;t bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking of implementing the older colour scheme but with this layout. I wanted navigation and better readability, but I think the old borders and what not worked well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of implementing the older colour scheme but with this layout. I wanted navigation and better readability, but I think the old borders and what not worked well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by rabidaskal</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidaskal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-493</guid>
		<description>I liked the color scheme of the old one better, but I prefer the new layout (the new scenario and release plan tabs) :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the color scheme of the old one better, but I prefer the new layout (the new scenario and release plan tabs) <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Look by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/new-look/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=354#comment-491</guid>
		<description>I think I like this look better, although I was used to the old one. Either way it&#039;s all good. Great job!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I like this look better, although I was used to the old one. Either way it&#8217;s all good. Great job!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cry Havoc Online Issue 1 by Wolfen_Karmans</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cry-havoc-online-issue-1/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen_Karmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=334#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Nahh! I received the new CHO in my mailbox today.... nothing really new...pity, but i expect the next issue to be mroe about the Cogs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nahh! I received the new CHO in my mailbox today&#8230;. nothing really new&#8230;pity, but i expect the next issue to be mroe about the Cogs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cogs Release Date by Wolfen_Karmans</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cogs-release-date/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen_Karmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=340#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Argg.... cannot wait.... i was expecting them in march or so... i think Im love of Cogs since that fluff in one of the CHO a few weeks ago whrn they where agiants the UNA.... 

anyway, cry and wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argg&#8230;. cannot wait&#8230;. i was expecting them in march or so&#8230; i think Im love of Cogs since that fluff in one of the CHO a few weeks ago whrn they where agiants the UNA&#8230;. </p>
<p>anyway, cry and wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cry Havoc Online Issue 1 by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cry-havoc-online-issue-1/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=334#comment-484</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right there could have been more information on Oni We&#039;ve got a lot of details come out about the Cogs, but we&#039;ve only been teased with a few production pictures of Oni.

Not getting CHO in my inbox was also a hassle. Hopefully they get those problems ironed out for next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right there could have been more information on Oni We&#8217;ve got a lot of details come out about the Cogs, but we&#8217;ve only been teased with a few production pictures of Oni.</p>
<p>Not getting CHO in my inbox was also a hassle. Hopefully they get those problems ironed out for next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cry Havoc Online Issue 1 by Wolfen_Karmans</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/cry-havoc-online-issue-1/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfen_Karmans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=334#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Agreed but theoretically the new CHO 1 in the frum was not all the information im stillwaiting to have it on my mailbox....

I still think also that more info about &quot;new&quot; armies Cogs and Oni is in order...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed but theoretically the new CHO 1 in the frum was not all the information im stillwaiting to have it on my mailbox&#8230;.</p>
<p>I still think also that more info about &#8220;new&#8221; armies Cogs and Oni is in order&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Point Holder by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/the-point-holder/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=327#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Landing is a bit of an interesting scenario as the attacker isn&#039;t trying to compete for VP point positions. In this situation you&#039;ll want to be able to take out infantry units primarily as getting AFV&#039;s off the table does not generate enough VP for the attacker to win. As the attacker a few smaller units is definitely the way to go as you get to increase the number of medics / overseers with reconstruction available to you and improve the chances a unit will make it off the battlefield. As the defender you want to be able to ground units to buy you time to generate VP. So smaller point holder units would be good but you only have 1 special weapon.  A full sized point holder cover 2 of the side VP points. A unit with 2/3 flamers will make any small unit think twice about trying to advance through them. I&#039;d say give it a go and see which might work out best for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landing is a bit of an interesting scenario as the attacker isn&#8217;t trying to compete for VP point positions. In this situation you&#8217;ll want to be able to take out infantry units primarily as getting AFV&#8217;s off the table does not generate enough VP for the attacker to win. As the attacker a few smaller units is definitely the way to go as you get to increase the number of medics / overseers with reconstruction available to you and improve the chances a unit will make it off the battlefield. As the defender you want to be able to ground units to buy you time to generate VP. So smaller point holder units would be good but you only have 1 special weapon.  A full sized point holder cover 2 of the side VP points. A unit with 2/3 flamers will make any small unit think twice about trying to advance through them. I&#8217;d say give it a go and see which might work out best for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Point Holder by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/strategy/the-point-holder/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=327#comment-479</guid>
		<description>How about multiple, smaller point holders which can gobble up more key locations?

For example, in Landing, we find we need more, smaller units in order to cover all the objectives.  Yes they are elimated more quickly, but then again you get more activations too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about multiple, smaller point holders which can gobble up more key locations?</p>
<p>For example, in Landing, we find we need more, smaller units in order to cover all the objectives.  Yes they are elimated more quickly, but then again you get more activations too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Importance of Heroes with Infantry by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/the-importance-of-heroes-with-infantry/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=294#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Vasatum, I&#039;ll check it out.

BTW you have a great site here. Ive found it very useful and enlightening - many thanks!

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Vasatum, I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
<p>BTW you have a great site here. Ive found it very useful and enlightening &#8211; many thanks!</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Importance of Heroes with Infantry by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/the-importance-of-heroes-with-infantry/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=294#comment-469</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right your LP are very important to use effectively, it really can make the difference between success and failure. I would say the activation sequence (and spending LP to reorder it) is equally important as well. Fire at Will is one of the new combat drills in Operation Frostbite. The Shield Formation and Eject combat drills are also found there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right your LP are very important to use effectively, it really can make the difference between success and failure. I would say the activation sequence (and spending LP to reorder it) is equally important as well. Fire at Will is one of the new combat drills in Operation Frostbite. The Shield Formation and Eject combat drills are also found there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Importance of Heroes with Infantry by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/the-importance-of-heroes-with-infantry/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=294#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Where is the &quot;Fire At will&quot; drill laid out? Ive never heard of it?

I&#039;m a relative newbie to AT-43 but it seems to me that the effective use of combat drills is the key to victory

cheers,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the &#8220;Fire At will&#8221; drill laid out? Ive never heard of it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a relative newbie to AT-43 but it seems to me that the effective use of combat drills is the key to victory</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infantry inferior to AFVs? Not Quite by Talarius</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/infantry-inferior-to-afvs-not-quite/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Talarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=287#comment-460</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent summary of the essence of AT-43!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent summary of the essence of AT-43!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large AP Games by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/large-ap-games/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=274#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Yeah for 3000 point games the rulebook missions work out fine. Its really only when you push into the 4500+ range that more control points are helpful to balance things out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah for 3000 point games the rulebook missions work out fine. Its really only when you push into the 4500+ range that more control points are helpful to balance things out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large AP Games by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/large-ap-games/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=274#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Cool. I&#039;m playing Mission #3, my Karmans vs RB at the weekend. We&#039;ll probably stick to 2000ap &amp; hope to have enough time to both be attacker (I.e. 2 battles). Nice to know we have the option to up to 3k in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. I&#8217;m playing Mission #3, my Karmans vs RB at the weekend. We&#8217;ll probably stick to 2000ap &amp; hope to have enough time to both be attacker (I.e. 2 battles). Nice to know we have the option to up to 3k in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large AP Games by Rednax</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/large-ap-games/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Rednax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=274#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Can 2000ap missions in main rulebook be used at 3000ap without modification?

At 2000ap I have to leave out too much of Karman Army. I do intend to try them at 2000ap first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can 2000ap missions in main rulebook be used at 3000ap without modification?</p>
<p>At 2000ap I have to leave out too much of Karman Army. I do intend to try them at 2000ap first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/happy-holidays/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=284#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Vastatum, 2009 looks to be a good year for AT-43. Here&#039;s toa good year. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Vastatum, 2009 looks to be a good year for AT-43. Here&#8217;s toa good year. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/happy-holidays/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=284#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Thanks, they were very merry, got a few games in and some good ideas for some new posts. Hope to start posting more regularly too. 2009 looks like a good year for AT-43.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, they were very merry, got a few games in and some good ideas for some new posts. Hope to start posting more regularly too. 2009 looks like a good year for AT-43.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/happy-holidays/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=284#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Hope your holidays were very Merry, and I look forward to your commentary in the upcoming year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope your holidays were very Merry, and I look forward to your commentary in the upcoming year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atis-Astarte &#8211; a Therian Must Have by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/atis-astarte-a-therian-must-have/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=163#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Thanks for catching that, I&#039;ve updated the post to reflect the correct rules. Glad you are enjoying the website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching that, I&#8217;ve updated the post to reflect the correct rules. Glad you are enjoying the website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Holidays by Talarius</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/happy-holidays/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Talarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=284#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks for the awesome site, here. Super-valuable stuff! Happy New Year. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for the awesome site, here. Super-valuable stuff! Happy New Year. <img src='http://www.at-43addict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atis-Astarte &#8211; a Therian Must Have by Blue Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/therians/atis-astarte-a-therian-must-have/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=163#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Hi vastatum, I love all the information that your website provides. Great job!!! One thing that I noticed about what you state in relation to Atis and her teleportation routine is incorrect. You state: &quot;The downside to this is that if some of your units cannot be placed in contact with the enemy and maintain cohesion, they are immediately eliminated.&quot; This is not correct. Only Atis needs to be in contact with the enemy unit. Here is the link where it was discussed. 

http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=1622&amp;highlight=atis

Again, thanks for the awesome website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi vastatum, I love all the information that your website provides. Great job!!! One thing that I noticed about what you state in relation to Atis and her teleportation routine is incorrect. You state: &#8220;The downside to this is that if some of your units cannot be placed in contact with the enemy and maintain cohesion, they are immediately eliminated.&#8221; This is not correct. Only Atis needs to be in contact with the enemy unit. Here is the link where it was discussed. </p>
<p><a href="http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=1622&amp;highlight=atis" rel="nofollow">http://en-forum.at-43.com/viewtopic.php?t=1622&amp;highlight=atis</a></p>
<p>Again, thanks for the awesome website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT-43 Starter Lists by Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at-43-starter-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=209#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Nice idea...and if you hurry you can get a lot of them for 1/3 the normal price:

http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/5dsale2008.html#minis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea&#8230;and if you hurry you can get a lot of them for 1/3 the normal price:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/5dsale2008.html#minis" rel="nofollow">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/5dsale2008.html#minis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Tournament Cranfield Uk by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at43-tournament-cranfield-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=95#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hopefully you guys get some new people coming out, I&#039;m listing all the community events that come up on the forums here so they get some more exposure. I won&#039;t be there as I&#039;m in Canada but hopefully some people see the post and are able to attend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully you guys get some new people coming out, I&#8217;m listing all the community events that come up on the forums here so they get some more exposure. I won&#8217;t be there as I&#8217;m in Canada but hopefully some people see the post and are able to attend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT43 Tournament Cranfield Uk by Dave Wilkin</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/at43-tournament-cranfield-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wilkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=95#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
 I am Dave Wilkin, from Bedford Gladiators. I am organising the Tournament at Cranfield&#039;s Wargame Workshop on Sat Nov 15th. I must admit I am not sure of numbers for the tournament, and after seeing your post on the blog, wondered how many people may be coming!! I envisaged maybe 6, 8 if we are really lucky! There are a few of us who enjoy AT43 at the Gladiators, and we would look forward to meeting other fans! (remember to mark your models in a way as to identify them as your property if you come along!!)
  Cheers, Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
 I am Dave Wilkin, from Bedford Gladiators. I am organising the Tournament at Cranfield&#8217;s Wargame Workshop on Sat Nov 15th. I must admit I am not sure of numbers for the tournament, and after seeing your post on the blog, wondered how many people may be coming!! I envisaged maybe 6, 8 if we are really lucky! There are a few of us who enjoy AT43 at the Gladiators, and we would look forward to meeting other fans! (remember to mark your models in a way as to identify them as your property if you come along!!)<br />
  Cheers, Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on News from Rackham by Vastatum</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/news-from-rackham/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Vastatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=111#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, this is great to hear. I will update the post to reflect this info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, this is great to hear. I will update the post to reflect this info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on News from Rackham by Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/news-from-rackham/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=111#comment-3</guid>
		<description>FYI,

Reps from R. are flying to North America this week to work on US.Canadian distribution issues personally. 

So, they are taking it very very seriously and we should be up and running by the end of Nov.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI,</p>
<p>Reps from R. are flying to North America this week to work on US.Canadian distribution issues personally. </p>
<p>So, they are taking it very very seriously and we should be up and running by the end of Nov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News (Maybe) From Rackham by at-43addict.com &#124; News from Rackham</title>
		<link>http://www.at-43addict.com/articles/good-news-maybe-from-rackham/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>at-43addict.com &#124; News from Rackham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://at-43addict.com/?p=29#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] leaves North America is anyones guess (I wrote about Fantasy Flight Games and Rackham&#8217;s split earlier). We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.    October 29, 2008 &#124; &#124; Tags: at43, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leaves North America is anyones guess (I wrote about Fantasy Flight Games and Rackham&#8217;s split earlier). We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.    October 29, 2008 | | Tags: at43, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
